Welcome! edit

Hello, Ao322, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Bluemint, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bluemint edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bluemint, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Ao322. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 01:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 01:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock Request of the Draft - Bluemint edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ao322 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Please find this request as a confirmation that there is no interest between me/author and the content of the article, the information provided are presented in order to inform the society about a brand. The content and the language used were tried to be kept objective, without provisioning any advertisement or third party interests. If you do believe still a COI(conflict of Interest), I would appreciate your assistance on the found evidence/proove that suggests the article to be blocked; so that I can correct the language/content to fulfill the desired requirements.

Decline reason:

The very premise of the draft - a "Company Profile" - is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. I am unconvinced by your request that you do not have a conflict of interest, and therefore you will not be unblocked to write about it. Furthermore, the draft was indeed promotional - if you believe starting a draft with "Bluemint London Ltd. is a United Kingdom based premium lifestyle brand" is objective I'm afraid you've written too many marketing documents. MER-C 16:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ao322 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

After the assistance and response of the reviewer, the corrective actions will be taken. The clear understanding of the content structure is now achieved. Please proceed unblocking, so that I can re-edit the content whereby no COI will be seen. The better version of the article is ready for the review if possible. Thanks for the supports. Ao322 (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

We aren't going to let you write about Bluemint here. What do you plan on doing instead? Yunshui  09:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ao322 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Although I would like to thank you for guiding me, I believe this conversation is far from the point of being "helpful". Please then, enlighten me on how companies such as Vilebrequin or Orlebor Brown have Wikipedia pages with languages you may refer to as 'marketing documents'. If you fail to enlighten me without actual proof - proof in companies that do not start with an opening line as I have - I will be forced to give feedback about you guidance as 'biased and unfair'. Appreciate by your supports. Ao322 (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, not an unblock request. If you just want to ask questions, please do so without the unblock request formatting. 331dot (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Microsoft, Apple Inc., Ford Motor Company and thousands of company articles are written in the proper encyclopedic tone, and almost always written by independent editors. If you see other articles that are worded inappropriately as yours was, feel free to point them out so they can be addressed. As this is a volunteer project, where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. Please read Other Stuff Exists. 331dot (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply