Archives

edit

I've done what you asked. While very short archives are not optimal, I wouldn't suggest fussing over them in the future. It's better to leave things like that as they were. Cheers, -Will Beback · · 08:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thanks for dropping by!! Come back sometime. Mature article? What Mature article? Richiar 06:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for comment. Nice Archive box. Your help is appreciated. I'll look at the ACIM sometime. Richiar 20:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cherub

edit

Hi! I responded to your comment on Talk:Cherub. Best, --Shirahadasha 21:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Endeavor academy.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Endeavor academy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Acim-book-2he.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Acim-book-2he.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Erika (singer)

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Erika (singer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika (singer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The_Crest_Jewel_of_Wisdom

edit

Hello, I noticed your work on Wikisource on Shankara, on the talk page of that project I placed the PDF from Internet Archive showing Devanagari with English as it was originally published. Devanagari is a bit challenging to transcribe correctly from the PDF so I also placed an annex on that talk page with the Devanagari and Romanized Tanscription with diacritics in Unicode for inclusion with the article. http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Talk:The_Crest_Jewel_of_Wisdom B9 hummingbird hovering (talkcontribs) 00:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply