Anriz

Hey Athenais?

I see you created an article on Athenais of Commagene and stated some coinage evidence. The sources linked do not seem to have the text that you state it does. What is the source for a coin that says "ΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΑ ΑΘΗΝΑΙΣ" ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.40.17 (talk) 14:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Publius Lollius Maximus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maximus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quintus Volusius (prefect), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drusus Claudius Nero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lucius Volusius Saturninus (suffect consul 12 BC), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drusus Claudius Nero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quintus Volusius Saturninus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucius Nonius Asprenas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quintus Volusius Flaccus Cornelianus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volusius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcus Licinius Scribonianus Camerinus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Histria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Licinia Cornelia Volusia Torquata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volusius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcus Lollius Paulinus Decimus Valerius Asiaticus Saturninus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volusius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Olympias of Armenia

Hi Anriz, could you check this article? I think there is something with it. Cheers. --Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lucius Aemilius Lepidus Paullus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• took off his official gown, seized an axe, and dashed it against the doors of that temple", (I, 3.3; quoting Julius Paris (translation from Loeb edition).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Messalina

I have just reversed your changes to the Messalina page. Your additions were removed as unreferenced (see WP:V) and violating Wikipedia policies on original research WP:NOR. The reasons for the original rewriting of the article are discussed on its talk page. Please read the WP guidelines mentioned above and then continue the discussion on the talk page before making further contentious changes to the article. Your reference to 'sections of articles that shouldn't never be deleted nor removed' would appear to be in violation of WP:OWN. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

MOS

Hello. Please see this edit diff. --Omnipaedista (talk) 17:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vibidius

The article Vibidius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

In my opinion this page is absolutely non-notable, what little content there is might be added as a marginal note to a more heavy-duty page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MinorStoop (talk) 06:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lysippus (grandson of Alcimachus of Apollonia)

The article Lysippus (grandson of Alcimachus of Apollonia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability; his relatives may be notable, but being mentioned in a single inscription is hardly a notable thing. A brief mention in his father's entry suffices for that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 10:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philip (son of Alcimachus of Apollonia)

The article Philip (son of Alcimachus of Apollonia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article simply mentions that he lived; most of the content is about his family, not Philip himself, who is not mentioned on having held any position of importance or done anything noteworthy. Clearly insufficient WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Constantine ✍ 10:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthias Ephlias

The article Matthias Ephlias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject doesn't meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajshul 😀 (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ulpia (grandmother of Hadrian)

The article Ulpia (grandmother of Hadrian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTGENEALOGY and WP:GNG, not one fact mentioned in the article or sources is about the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 23:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ulpia (grandmother of Hadrian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulpia (grandmother of Hadrian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulpia (grandmother of Hadrian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 02:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Olympias (sister of Praetorian prefect Seleucus) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olympias (sister of Praetorian prefect Seleucus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympias (sister of Praetorian prefect Seleucus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus)

The article Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 20:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Athenais of Media Atropatene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athenais of Media Atropatene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athenais of Media Atropatene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 00:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Darius II of Media Atropatene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darius II of Media Atropatene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darius II of Media Atropatene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Agathocles (grandson of Agathocles of Syracuse)

The article Agathocles (grandson of Agathocles of Syracuse) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:BASIC and possibly WP:V. Only reference is an unreliable web source full of genealogical speculations which mentions the subject in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthias (brother of Josephus)

The article Matthias (brother of Josephus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus), the article and sources do not have anything to say about the individual himself. WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY are not met.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthias Curtus

The article Matthias Curtus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus), the article and sources do not have anything to say about the individual himself. WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY are not satisfied.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 11:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Simon Psellus

The article Simon Psellus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus), the article and sources barely have anything to say about the individual himself. WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY are not satisfied.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 11:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthias (father of Josephus)

The article Matthias (father of Josephus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephus (grandfather of Flavius Josephus), the article and sources barely have anything to say about the individual himself. As his supposed notability is inherited from his relative, WP:BASIC and WP:NOTGENEALOGY are not satisfied.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vibullia Alcia Agrippina

The article Vibullia Alcia Agrippina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trivial individual that fails WP:GNG, coverage is limited to genealogy cruft already mentioned on relatives' articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Artaxias (son of Tiran of Armenia)

The article Artaxias (son of Tiran of Armenia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, doesn't seem to have reigned, no accomplishments are known, and the only coverage is a single passing mention in a primary source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Polemon Eupator

The article Polemon Eupator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC and possibly WP:V. Mentioned apparently by only a single source here, which does not even indicate will full certainty the subject's existence. Some assertions of the article are simply not corroborated by the sources, and some of the content appears to be WP:OR. The rest is irrelevant genealogical trivia. Subject did not reign, no accomplishments are known, and I can find nothing that can shore up this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rhoemetalces Philocaesar

The article Rhoemetalces Philocaesar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC and possibly WP:V. Mentioned apparently by only a single source here, which does not even indicate with full certainty the subject's existence. Some assertions of the article are simply not corroborated by the sources. The rest is irrelevant genealogical trivia. Subject did not reign, no accomplishments are known, and I can find nothing that can shore up this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 02:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Polemon Eupator for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polemon Eupator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polemon Eupator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Rhoemetalces Philocaesar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhoemetalces Philocaesar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhoemetalces Philocaesar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Artaxias (son of Tiran of Armenia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artaxias (son of Tiran of Armenia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artaxias (son of Tiran of Armenia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Theoclia (sister of Alexander Severus) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theoclia (sister of Alexander Severus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theoclia (sister of Alexander Severus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

★Trekker (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Domitia (sister of Longina)

The article Domitia (sister of Longina) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Julia Bodina

The article Julia Bodina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claudia Dicaeosyna

The article Claudia Dicaeosyna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucius Vibullius Rufus (son-in-law of Herodes Atticus)

The article Lucius Vibullius Rufus (son-in-law of Herodes Atticus) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:INVALIDBIO, already mentioned in relatives' articles with no loss of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucius Vibullius Rufus (son-in-law of Herodes Atticus) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucius Vibullius Rufus (son-in-law of Herodes Atticus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucius Vibullius Rufus (son-in-law of Herodes Atticus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 21:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Aka II of Commagene for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aka II of Commagene is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aka II of Commagene until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 01:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Claudia Dicaeosyna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudia Dicaeosyna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Dicaeosyna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 02:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus (grandson of Herodes Atticus) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus (grandson of Herodes Atticus) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus (grandson of Herodes Atticus) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

"Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#Laodice (wife of Mithridates II of Commagene) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sandstein 17:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aka I of Commagene

The article Aka I of Commagene has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INVALIDBIO, WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Obscure person who happens to be mentioned in stone somewhere, but without the coverage required to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Domitia (sister of Longina) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Domitia (sister of Longina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domitia (sister of Longina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucius Vibullius Rufus

The article Lucius Vibullius Rufus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INVALIDBIO, WP:NOTGENEALOGY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Bodina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Bodina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bodina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 01:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Julia Urania

The article Julia Urania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are unreliable and self-published, lacks WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Urania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Urania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Urania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 03:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus

The article Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INVALIDBIO, WP:NOTGENEALOGY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 16:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucius Vibullius Hipparchus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Avilich (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Flavius Justus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flavius Justus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavius Justus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:41, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tiridates (son of Tiran of Armenia) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tiridates (son of Tiran of Armenia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiridates (son of Tiran of Armenia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Avilich (talk) 02:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)