Anola177, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi Anola177!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Hadjiathanasiou edit

 

The article Andreas Hadjiathanasiou has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. G S Palmer (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Panayiotis Loizides edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Panayiotis Loizides. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Theofilos Chrysochos edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Theofilos Chrysochos. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Ciro Immobile, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 19:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Borussia Dortmund, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The transfer does not take effect until 1 July. His jersey number is not known. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Anorthosis FC to Anorthosis Famagusta edit

Please dont change Anorthosis Famagusta to Anorthosis FC again! the real Club title is Anorthosis Famagusta no Anorthosis FC

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Argento1985. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Anorthosis Famagusta F.C. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. you have defaced the whole squad of Anorthosis without providing any evidence. the players that you have removed did not answer to the management yet if they are staying or not. Your abusive behavior destroys others dedicated work. Argento1985 19:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Razak Nuhu, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Razak Nuhu. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 17:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Razak Nuhu. GiantSnowman 17:28, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Hadjiathanasiou edit

 

The article Andreas Hadjiathanasiou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Giorgi Aburjania edit

 

The article Giorgi Aburjania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Giorgi Aburjania for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Aburjania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Aburjania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Giorgi Aburjania. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgi Aburjania edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giorgi Aburjania, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recreation of articles edit

Repeatedly recreating articles, especially ones deleted by discussion, as you have done with Giorgi Aburjania‎ is disruptive. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Best Regards. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Giorgi Aburjania for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgi Aburjania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgi Aburjania (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

S.L. Benfica edit

Don't sandbox in articles. SLBedit (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Giorgos Papageorgiou moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Giorgos Papageorgiou, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 02:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Christoforos Christofi moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Christoforos Christofi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Josef Hušbauer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 13:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marios Stylianou. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andreas Chrysostomou edit

 

The article Andreas Chrysostomou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, hasn't played yet in a fully professional league or cup game or the senior national team.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Andreas Chrysostomou for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Chrysostomou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Chrysostomou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 16:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Luka Mikaia edit

 

The article Luka Mikaia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

currently fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 22:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Giorgos Papageorgiou edit

 

Hello, Anola177. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giorgos Papageorgiou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Christoforos Christofi edit

 

Hello, Anola177. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christoforos Christofi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ibrahim Koneh edit

 

The article Ibrahim Koneh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 22:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Konstantinos Georgallides for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konstantinos Georgallides is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstantinos Georgallides until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GGT (talk) 21:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply