User talk:Annexxation/Archive 1

Archive 1

July 2014

Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to R. Budd Dwyer, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Frosty (Talk page) 05:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Alan Passaro

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. This is just to let you know that I changed Alan Passaro into a redirect to Death of Meredith Hunter, since the article on Passaro didn't seem to add any new information not already covered in the latter article on Hunter's death. Normally such an article would be speedy deleted but I felt it was more constructive to have it be a redirect. This being said, if you believe that Passaro may meet the requirements to have his own article I reccomend starting it in a Userspace draft so you have plenty of time to expand and improve it. Cheers, RA0808 ^talk_contribs 18:52, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Katie Rich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Katie Rich was changed by DIRECTIVEA113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894356 on 2017-01-21T16:04:56+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hi there, if you're trying to create a new page, please start with a completely empty edit box. We can't just write over the contents of an existing article, like you did with this edit to the Liberty City article. If you don't know how to start a article, you should read WP:How to create a page. Cmr08 (talk) 05:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

In reply to your message on my talk page, if you want to learn how to create a new page, then you should read WP:How to create a page that I mentioned to you above. Cmr08 (talk) 01:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

It appears that you have added material on Liberty City copied from the Grand Theft Wiki (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use licensed content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original author(s). When copying from other compatibly-licensed web pages, please at minimum mention in an edit summary at the new page where you got the content. It's also a good idea to place a note on the article along with your citation. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied licensed material before, even if it was a long time ago, please go back and provide attribution. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shadilay

The article Shadilay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and no substantive case for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Robert McClenon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Robert McClenon that didn't seem very civil, so it has been remove . Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Shadilay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadilay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadilay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ActuallyIceCube

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, User:ActuallyIceCube, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:31, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Redlands Mall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redlands Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redlands Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. House1090 (talk) 01:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Falling Down. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 02:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Seigenthaler. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Kostja (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop creating random userpages. Home Lander (talk) 18:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at John Seigenthaler. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to John Seigenthaler, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

• I was about to warn you that I was going to indefinitely block you if you continued to create userpages of users other than yourself. I see Ronhjones has blocked your for other reasons. When you are unblocked, please do not create any more userpages for random users (some of whom are blocked, and at least one of whom actually asked for their userpage to be deleted.) If you do, it will result in a block longer than 31 hours. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annexxation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not know that making pages for other users was prohibited, I apologize. Annexxation (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.