Speedy deletion nomination of List of electronic cigarette retailers

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on List of electronic cigarette retailers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of List of electronic cigarette retailers and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. We hope (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

edit

Yo. When you add the hangon tag, you don't delete the db-spam tag. Both need to be there. Just letting you know. Sven Manguard Talk 03:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Account blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Annabeeme (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unfair block. Being blocked because we are on a network with a lot of users in our residence and all agree that posts are unfairly being removed. If they were for advertising purposes it wouldn't advertise competitors.

Decline reason:

You have not been blocked for advertising, but for abusing multiple accounts.  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 05:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.