Ankur Paul (2)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Santragachi Kedarnath Institution. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Ankur Paul (2), you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ankur Paul (2)! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Santragachi Kedarnath Institution, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your message on my talk page. Wikipedia works by including content that is sourced to reliable, secondary sources, so your own personal knowledge does not meet those criteria. As I said in the edit summaries, wikipedia is not a directory or business listing, so contact details should not be included in the way you have kept adding them. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 23:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Santragachi Kedarnath Institution, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Santragachi Kedarnath Institution, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 21:45, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Santragachi Kedarnath Institution. Melcous (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN ^{talk to me} 09:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Santragachi Kedarnath Institution (Girls) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santragachi Kedarnath Institution (Girls) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santragachi Kedarnath Institution (Girls) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)