Anjuliyoung

Welcome

Hello, Anjuliyoung, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! §everal⇒|Times 14:26, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Chick embryo

I have taken some time to clean up your Chick embryo article, including adding appropriate wikilinks, and removal of language that is not of the appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. However, there are still some significant issues to be resolved:

1. The article cites no sources.
2. The article is incomplete.

There are hints of sources in the various parenthetical attributions, and there were hints of more material to come (perhaps you are working on this collaboratively with some other editors?). If the plan is to develop the article incrementally over several days or weeks, might I suggest you do so in your user space instead -- say at User:Anjuliyoung/Chick embryo? I would also suggest a different title for the article, something along the lines of Chicken as scientific research model to more properly reflect the subject of the article. If you would like any help with any of these changes, feel free to ask! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chick embryo

The article Chick embryo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The author has created a copy at User:Anjuliyoung/Chick embryo to complete work on the page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Full citations, please

The citation list for Chick embryo currently reads as:

1. Murphy, 1914a; Murphy, 1914b
2. Levi-Montalcini, 1952
3. Stehelin et al., 1976a; Stehelin et al., 1976b
4. Rous, 1918
5. Bader et al., 2006
6. Murphy and Rous, 1912
7. Dagg et al., 1954
8. Easty et al., 1969
9. Nicolson et al., 1978
10. Ossowski and Reich, 1983
11. Eliceiri et al., 1998
12. Chambers et al., 1982
13. Gordon and Quigley, 1986
14. Chambers et al., 1998
15. Zijlstra et al., 2002
16. Zijlstra et al., 2002
17. Wong et al., 2004

Clearly, these citations are insufficient for an independent editor to look up to verify the information you have included. Please provide full citations, with author names, publication names, URLs if the material is available online, etc. (I.e. sufficient information for someone else to know what you're talking about.) WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Good start on clearing up those citations. More work is needed. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Article name

I have pointed out before that I believe the title of your Chick embryo article is inappropriate, as the article has a very specific topic regarding research involving chickens (both embryonic and full-grown). Please add your thoughts to the discussion going on at Talk:Chick embryo. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I think he article name should remain chick embryo because, while there is information about chickens, it is merely here to add perspective. The main focus of he article is the chick embryo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.168.7.23 (talk) 13:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Please address your comments at Talk:Chick embryo so that others involved in the conversation may see them. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Timeline

You probably worked really hard creating this. Unfortunately, that's a rather poor method of conveying information at Wikipedia. I have converted the information to a standard Wikipedia table instead. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank You! This is my first wikipedia page (as you could probably tell) and I really appreciate the help.

Glad to help. You'll notice that the references spelled out in the table need to be fully expanded. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Citations

Please stop changing citations such as

 <ref name=Magner2010/>

to

 <ref> name=Magner2010</ref>

If you don't understand how the reference tags work, please ask, but what you are doing is breaking the referencing syntax to make meaningless references. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry! I changed them because I'm going to add the full citations in those spots, as soon as I get them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.115.3 (talk) 15:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. When you do so, add the full citation to the references that currently have the form:

 <ref name=Bellairs2005>Bellairs, 2005</ref>

In such a citation, replace the text between the opening and closing tags:

 <ref name=xyz>Your text goes here</ref>

and leave the rest of the citation alone. For all other citations to the same work, leave the citations as I have created them:

 <ref name=xyz/>

This creates a single citation, with multiple references to it. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Chicken as biological research model

Hello Anjuliyoung. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chicken as biological research model, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Creator was not the only editor of this page. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)