Wikipedia

User talk:Anirudh Emani/Archive 6

< User talk:Anirudh Emani
Latest comment: 10 years ago by The ed17 in topic WikiCup 2013 September newsletter
Archive 1 ← Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2012 October newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

The 2012 WikiCup has come to a close; congratulations to   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), our 2012 champion! Cwmhiraeth joins our exclusive club of previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009), Sturmvogel 66 (2010) and Hurricanehink (2011). Our final standings were as follows:

  1.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2.   Sasata (submissions)
  3.   Grapple X (submissions)
  4.   Casliber (submissions)
  5.   Muboshgu (submissions)
  6.   Miyagawa (submissions)
  7.   Ruby2010 (submissions)
  8.   Dana Boomer (submissions)

Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.

Awards will be handed out in the coming days; please bear with us! This year's competition also saw fantastic contributions in all rounds, from newer Wikipedians contributing their first good or featured articles, right up to highly experienced Wikipedians chasing high scores and contributing to topics outside of their usual comfort zones. It would be impossible to name all of the participants who have achieved things to be proud of, but well done to all of you, and thanks! Wikipedia has certainly benefited from the work of this year's WikiCup participants.

Next year's WikiCup will begin in January. Currently, discussions and polls are open, and all contributions are welcome. You can also sign up for next year's competition. There will be no further newsletters this year, although brief notes may be sent out in December to remind everyone about the upcoming competition. It's been a pleasure to work with you all, and we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Nilam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyderabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

JTWC Classifications

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Can you please refrain from adding in 1-minute windspeeds into infoboxes for systems that the JTWC hasnt classified as a tropical cyclone. This is because the infobox ends up saying that the JTWC has classified the system as a tropical depression which for the majority of their basin isnt true since their warning level is TS.Jason Rees (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, actually, the NRL does show that the disturbance had reached 30kt winds. Problem is, if we solely depend on the JTWC for the 1-min winds, we might not know whether a system is actually a tropical depression on the SSHS or not. Since the NRL is also a part of US navy(i believe it is), we should be updating our infoboxes with NRL data until the JTWC starts monitoring the system. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
No we shouldnt be including the NRL data because we have no way of knowing if the JTWC thinks it is a tropical depression and not a extratropical low or whatever, since an invest is solely an area of disturbed weather that the US warning centres are interested in. Also do we really NEED to know what the system was on the SSHS before the JTWC initiates as at the end of the day the SSHS is a completely unofficial scale outside of the NHC areas.Jason Rees (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone seasons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 1999–00 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season, 1998–99 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season and 1997–98 Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bopha

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hey just to note you, what did i done to the Bopha article?--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 22:54, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, good good good, thank you got reverting Objectivesea's edits...maybe, mistaken viewing.--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 11:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hurray! Source for 2012NIOCS is INACTIVE!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here's the damn source we have been finding! http://pakistanweatherportal.com/2012/12/22/christmas-formation-tropical-storm-forming-in-the-arabian-sea/ Now you know what to do Indian neighbor! --✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 12:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 starting soon

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there; you're receiving this message because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup. This is just to remind you that the 2013 WikiCup will be starting on 1 January, and that signups will remain open throughout January. Old and new Wikipedians and WikiCup participants are warmly invited to take part in this year's competition. (Though, as a note to the more experienced participants, there have been a few small rules changes in the last few months.) If you have already signed up, let this be a reminder; you will receive a message with your submissions' page soon. Please direct any questions to the WikiCup talk page. Thanks! J Milburn 19:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

SpiceJet/Routemap

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

May I ask why you have put the above in namespace? If you are working on content for your article on SpiceJet, you should do it in a sandbox, not mainspace. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SpiceJet/Routemap

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on SpiceJet/Routemap requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Satellizer talk contribs 07:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I moved it for you so it wouldn't get speedy'd

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

it is here: User:User:Anikingos/sandbox2

Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I figured it was something you needed and just put in mainspace by mistake. Glad to help. Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Hello, Anirudh Emani. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 16:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Abhishek  Talk 16:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingfisher Airlines, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ATF and Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image Removal

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

With reference to your edits on IndiGo, Don't remove images that are exist on wikimedia on your own judgement without consensus. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 03:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

I removed the image because it doesn't give a nice view of the aircraft. All IndiGo aircraft are the same and the image of the plane taxiing at the Dubai airport gives a better view. Also, the article is too small to have too many images. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Reasons is logical enough, thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader (  Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years.   12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

  •   Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
  •   Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
  •   HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of   The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Barnstar of Diligence
For all the hard work that you have put in cleaning, expanding and maintaining airport and airline articles of India. Cheers!   — Abhishek  Talk 17:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Air India Building

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I made Air India Building into its own article again since I found more press coverage. Plus it's the first building in India with an escalator WhisperToMe (talk) 06:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

That's okay!! But then the article definitely needs A LOT of updating and expansion. I suggest you should help expand the article if you know much about it.--Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Ok! I'll check the news archives and see what I can find :) - I also had made a request to have a Hindi version of the article started, and the request resulted in a Hindi article WhisperToMe (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
I found some tidbits. An American architect designed the building. And Aamir Khan first saw his now-wife there. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Whups - I realized his wife was at the residential building and not the commercial one (I did Google Maps to see if Aamir Khan's apartment was near Nariman Point - it's not) WhisperToMe (talk) 01:21, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A cup of coffee for you!

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Take a quick sip, you need it especially after your contributions on 2013 Hyderabad blasts.

As Elbert Hubbard once said, "The highest reward that God gives us for good work is the ability to do better". Hence, Keep up the good work. Cheers, Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 10:47, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:

  1.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
  2.   Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
  3.   Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with   Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by   The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Orphaned non-free media (File:Zeetv.jpg)

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Thanks for uploading File:Zeetv.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anikingos/HURDAT 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Anikingos/HURDAT 2012, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jason Rees (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Animax airdates

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hey Anikingos. I see that you've added the Animax air dates to Tegami Bachi [1]. Unfortunately, that is not the first English air date. I think it aired first in 2011 ([2]). 五代 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't remember the exact date. We could use the dates given in the above link :) I'm an Indian too, btw. An Indian anime fan ;) 五代 (talk) 13:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hehe, I am an Indian. Animax introduced me to anime and I've been watching it since 2007 :) My username consists of the names of two of my favorite characters, Ryoga Hibiki (from Ranma 1/2) and Yusaku Godai (from Maison Ikkoku). 五代 (talk) 04:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate   Miyagawa (submissions) (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's   Casliber (submissions) (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr (  Hawkeye7 (submissions)), on the European hare (  Cwmhiraeth (submissions)), on the constellation Circinus (  Keilana (submissions) and   Casliber (submissions)) and on the Third Epistle of John (  Cerebellum (submissions)). All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chashme Baddoor (2013 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siddharth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with   Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place   Casliber (submissions) and second place   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 15:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note.   Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition:   Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted   Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to   Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example,   Casliber (submissions) and   Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Animax beforeafter.JPG)

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Thanks for uploading File:Animax beforeafter.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's   Sasata (submissions) currently leads overall, while Pool B's   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today,   Miyagawa (submissions), with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by   Ealdgyth (submissions), and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by   Piotrus (submissions),   Hawkeye7 (submissions) and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Animax beforeafter.JPG

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Animax beforeafter.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 06:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 August newsletter

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This year's final is upon us. Our final eight, in order of last round's score, are:

  1.   Hawkeye7 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer who has contributed on topics of military history and physics, including a number of high-importance topics. Good articles have made up the bulk of his points, but he has also scored a great deal of bonus points. He has the second highest score overall so far, with more than 3000 points accumulated.
  2.   Casliber (submissions), another WikiCup veteran who reached the finals in 2012, 2011 and 2010. He writes on a variety of topics including botany, mycology and astronomy, and has claimed the highest or joint highest number of featured articles every round so far this year. He has the third highest score overall, with just under 3000 points accumulated.
  3.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 WikiCup champion, who writes mostly on marine biology. She has also contributed to high-importance topics, seeing huge numbers of bonus points for high-importance featured and good articles. Previous rounds have seen her scoring the most bonus points, with scoring spread across did you knows, good articles and featured articles.
  4.   Sasata (submissions), a WikiCup veteran who finished in second place in 2012, and competed as early as 2009. He writes articles on biology, especially mycology, and has scored highly for a number of collaborations at featured article candidates.
  5.   Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), the winner of the 2010 competition. His contributions mostly concern Naval history, and he has scored a very large number of points for good articles and good article reviews in every round. He is the highest scorer overall this year, with over 3500 points in total.
  6.   Ealdgyth (submissions), who is competing in the WikiCup for the second time, though this will be her first time in the final. A regular at FAC, she is mostly interested in British medieval history, and has scored very highly for some top-importance featured articles on the topic.
  7.   Miyagawa (submissions), a finalist in 2012 and 2011. He writes on a broad variety of topics, with many of this year's points coming from good articles about Star Trek. Good articles make up the bulk of his points, and he had the most good articles back in round 2; he was also the highest scorer for DYK in rounds 1 and 2.
  8.   Adam Cuerden (submissions) has previously been involved with the WikiCup, but hasn't participated for a number of years. He scores mostly from restoration work leading to featured picture credits, but has also done some article writing and reviewing.

We say goodbye to eight great participants who did not qualify for the final:   Piotrus (submissions),   Figureskatingfan (submissions),   ThaddeusB (submissions),   Dana boomer (submissions),   Status (submissions),   Ed! (submissions),   12george1 (submissions),   Calvin999 (submissions). Having made it to this stage is still an excellent achievement, and you can leave with your heads held high. We hope to see you all again next year. Signups are now open for the 2014 WikiCup, which will begin on 1 January. All Wikipedians, whatever their interest or level of experience, are warmly invited to participate in next year's competition.

This last month has seen some incredible contributions; for instance, Cwmhiraeth's Starfish and Ealdgyth's Battle of Hastings—two highly important, highly viewed pages—made it to featured article status. It would be all too easy to focus solely on these stunning achievements at the expense of those participants working in lower-scoring areas, when in fact all WikiCup participants are doing excellent work. A mention of everything done is impossible, but here are a few: Last round saw the completion of several good topics (on the 1958, 1959 and 1962 Atlantic hurricane seasons) to which 12george1 had contributed. Calvin999 saw "S&M" (song), on which he has been working for several years, through to featured article status on its tenth try. Figureskatingfan continued towards her goal of a broad featured/good topic on Maya Angelou, with two featured and four good articles. ThaddeusB contributed significantly to over 20 articles which appeared on the main page's "in the news" section. Adam Cuerden continued to restore a large number of historical images, resulting in over a dozen FP credits this round alone. The WikiCup is not just about top-importance featured articles, and the work of all of these users is worthy of commendation.

Finally, the usual notices: If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 05:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion.   Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice.   Sasata (submissions),   Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and   Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anirudh_Emani/Archive_6&oldid=1142853775"