Social Media article used on Wikipedia is the generally accepted term by people (India). Most Indians look up to Wikipedia to gain their understanding. The problem with this has been that they have got it wrong. What's even worse is that our Indian Education System is telling students that Social Media = Lots of Copy Writing. (Which isn't true)

Social Media is a 'network of people' that use digital platforms to communicate with each other. If I have to spread a news I can share it via Email, Social Networks, Messengers, Forums - all which are social in nature. These technologies allow us to communicate with people & society.

Unlike Print, Hoardings, Social Media is the communication between people on the internet, that 'stays' on the internet. This means that technology has finally enabled us to capture Word-of-Mouth giving rise to the birth of Social Media. Anikethdsouza (talk) 06:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anikethdsouza/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Anikethdsouza/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 18:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Anikethdsouza. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User:Anikethdsouza/sandbox, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 18:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anikethdsouza (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I realised my mistake of why I was blocked. It's been a while since I have not submitted anything to Wikipedia and now I genuinely want to contribute information that is factual & published in major journals with verifiable online links. I will henceforth not contribute anything which includes my opinions or promote any products. Request you to kindly unblock me.Anikethdsouza (talk) 10:16, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This does not address your violations of WP:PAID or WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 10:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.