- Interesting topic and a lot of information
- Please add more hyperlinks to terminology
- Maybe add Chromosome 1 picture also that represents the gene.
- Maybe add more sources in current research since there is so much information on the disease as you have written on your page (ex genes, hyperandrogenism etc are already known so what else? can be added)
*There is not much ongoing research regarding the gene itself because the condition is so rare. I have discussed PCOS as a potential current research because that is something very common however that is not the topic of my article so I did not want to overdo it.
- Overall good job - I personally like this topic.
--Skumar25 (talk) 04:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)SKumar
- Needs a few more citations. All sections should have a citation at least near the end.
- There is a picture on the gene's page that would be useful here.
- " The downfall to this is that quality of life may not be as ideal due to infertility, difficulty engaging in intercourse, the reoccurrence of kidney stones, and more." Feels judgmental. Try to maintain distance. This is an encyclopedia article.
- Could use more links to other wiki pages
- Recent research should all be from the past 10 years, preferably 5.
*My current research is from 2013 and 2016 which is from the last 5-10 years.
- Good structure, with lots of information! This is a really solid draft.
Review edit
- Images of Gene would be helpful
- Need more hyperlinks that connects the info present to other articles
- The subject is very interesting and you've done a good job with the layout!
- It reads fluently so I can easily grasp the concept--Good Job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isaacadu1 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- On the introduction when you mentin Mayer-Rokitansky Syndrome I would suggest to add (MRKH) after mentioning the complete name.
* I didn't change this because this was the "blurb" that came with my article so I did not want to manipulate it in any way. I added the acronym in my own discussion later in the article.
- For causes section I would suggest to split up the 2 paragraphs into make 4 or 3 in order for it to be more concise. Are there any enviromental factors?
No enivornmental factors. It is a genetic, congenital disease. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anicolaie (talk • contribs) 22:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Diagnosis section: add more citations on the first paragraph. Are there different dieases that are associated with WNT4?
I spoke about this in a later section.
- For related disroders: How can MRKH and WNT4 defiency be corrected on the diagnosis? How is that process?
I spoke about this briefly, it would require further genetic testing and scanning to confirm the disorder.
- What areas of WNT4 gene still need more research? I like how your current researhc is explainined and alll is also very recent from past 10 years. Overall you have plenty of information and just have to add an image of a symptom or a diagnostic test
The area that needs more research is based on more cases surfacing. The knowledge behind the gene itself exists, but this condition is so rare that research to discover what happens is very minimal. I discussed this in the last paragraph. --Mdiana294 (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)--Mdiana294 (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)--Mdiana294 (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)