 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of CadAPL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC) |
AngryMan2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was editing a page with all related sources, so why should I be blocked ?! I have added 4,148 bytes on it, yet banned and for good ! This site is not a free editing platform ! AngryMan2018 (talk) 21:16, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked, as it is suspected that you are a sockpuppet of CadAPL. SQLQuery me! 21:57, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AngryMan2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What is the proof that I am a sockpuppet? I edited three or four pages so far! Is that a reason for blocking? AngryMan2018 (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AngryMan2018 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am the one who is asking about the reason for being blocked ! You accuse me of being a sockpuppet, where is your proof?! I created this account a week ago then got blocked ! You can review my edits whether I am causing "damage or disruption" or making useful contributions ! The block decision is taken by one admin, then two others asking me to write the reason ! I do not want to keep posting requests!
Decline reason:
You will bed to post your unblock request on the talk page of your original account. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:59, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.