Anes112
January 2024 edit
Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Visa policy of Fiji—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
You are not right edit
Anes112 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You know, I'm not going to apologise to you. Because you don't give really good editors with good intentions the opportunity to improve articles. Where is the principle of free editing, which is what Wikipedia is all about? If you are not satisfied with something, you could just write or at least inform about a warning ? Why block immediately, listening to some people who make denunciations without any clear argumentation. And most importantly: these people themselves do not improve anything. And people like me just take away their work and thus, they get mad. You call me a puppet, made a separate page (for attention), as if I am some kind of criminal, although you do not know who actually edits. You just don't want to see such people, you hang in your bureaucracy and do everything by the book. That's the impression I got.
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.