Speedy deletion nomination of Boys Who Like Girls edit

Hello Andynort,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boys Who Like Girls for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vermont (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Boys Who Like Girls edit

Hello, Andynort. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Boys Who Like Girls, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Vermont (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Boys Who Like Girls (2018 film) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Boys Who Like Girls (2018 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page.

An article on Wikipedia requires independent, third party reliable sources to demonstrate notability. In this case the criteria are listed in WP:NFILM. Facebook, IMDB and PR material are not adequate to demonstrate notability. I have moved this to draft space to allow you time to get the article to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria rather than simply nominating it for deletion Jbh Talk 11:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

 

Hello Andynort. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Andynort. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Andynort|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jbh Talk 11:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boys Who Like Girls (2018 film ) (May 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Andynort! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Boys Who Like Girls (2018 film) edit

 

Hello, Andynort. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Boys Who Like Girls (2018 film).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 18:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)Reply