Peer Review- The Lead: I found the lead helpful in conveying what Power Posing is, but it could perhaps have a bit more information. More of a brief summary or a few keys points from the rest of the article. It doesn't need too much more in my opinion, just make it reflect the more important information from later on. Structure: The structure of the entire article is very good and clear to follow. I like the research section and the sub sections under that. Balance: Information spread throughout the article is well balanced. The more important, original article (by Carney et al.) gets the spotlight and the biggest contribution, but its balanced well by your subsections under that and the other research too. Neutral Content: The research is presented well and in a neutral light. good job! Sources: All information (unless I missed something) looks like its cited well. Research articles cited are also good sources of information. Citations are also well spread, meaning no one article is the source of the majority of statements. Overall, Great job! -Rachel RachelPiles (talk) 03:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)