AndreiAccurex

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

You are repeatedly inserting a spam-link to an online Irish VAT calculation site on various articles. As well as being spam, this is not a WP:RS for Wikipedia. In addition, you have violated WP:3RR on various articles. If you persist, you will have your account blocked. Britishfinance (talk) 13:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

I asked you, repeatedly, to provide arguments for labeling my link as spam. From your vague answers, we can label 95% of the links on that page SPAM.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GermanJoe (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

• Read the linked guidelines if you need more information. Wikipedia is no venue to promote your personal website - and edit-war about it to boot. Any further additions will get the domain blacklisted as well.[1] GermanJoe (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AndreiAccurex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I read the guidelines. There is no spam. Why don't you remove https://www.vatglobal.com/eu-vat-table for example?

Decline reason:

Repeatedly edit-warring to insert the same link gives the decided impression that you are only here to drive traffic to your website. We regard that as spamming. Yunshui ^雲_水 14:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.