And Rotate

Notable Alumni entries

To be considered notable, an entry is expected to have its own Wikipedia article. That's why the edits have been getting deleted. _signed, Willondon (talk) 19:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

(e/c) Another approach would be to create an article for the individual. You would need secondary sources to verify not only that things are true, but that they are also notable. You mentioned a large number of subscribers / followers on YouTube, so that's a start. Again, though, you need a secondary source to indicate its signifigance. My last bit of advice is to take things slowly, and not get overheated. You seem to have a genuine interest in adding constructively to Wikipedia; but keep in mind that the project is over 15 years old, and in that time has developed a maze of systems, policies, rules, guidelines, etc. Sometimes this means that a new editor's changes go against the consensus, and it will be difficult to make changes against a history of discussion and decisions that have formed a consensus. Sorry, but that's the way it goes. _signed, Willondon (talk) 20:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hi And Rotate! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Regis High School (New York City) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Regis High School (New York City), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

thank you!! this is very helpful and enlightening! And Rotate (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)