Welcome! edit

 
Welcome!

Hello, Anbupaithal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Anbupaithal, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Live (Malayalam film) edit

 

The article Live (Malayalam film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already a more fleshed-out article about this film at Live (2023 film).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LemonOrangeLime (talk) 04:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello,@LemonOrangeLime I deproDed it. The page shows 4 quoted 3 film reviews and the film is thus deemed notable. The page can be improved. Best, -MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 09:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
My apologie to both of you. I had not read the Prod Rationale.Indeed, the page already exists. I'll redirect and transfer what I think useful, it if you don't mind. Best,-MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 09:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I moved the plot section from your original page to the target page, thank you. The rest was already there, including the 2 negative and the 1 positive review. Best,-MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 10:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
thank you! glad this could be resolved in a productive way. LemonOrangeLime (talk) 15:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kiran Kumar (entrepreneur) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Kumar (entrepreneur) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Kumar (entrepreneur) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akshithmanya talk 15:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Kiran Kumar (entrepreneur) edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kiran Kumar (entrepreneur), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lalitha Jewellery for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lalitha Jewellery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalitha Jewellery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lalitha Jewellery edit

At your undeletion request, you stated that you had more information to add to the page. May I suggest you move it to draft until you do so? I still cannot locate sourcing sufficient to meet WP:NCORP. CNMall41 (talk) 08:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Lalitha Jewellery edit

Hello Anbupaithal, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lalitha Jewellery, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalitha Jewellery (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CNMall41}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CNMall41 (talk) 20:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 edit

 

Hello Anbupaithal. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Odyzon, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anbupaithal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anbupaithal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

As you've chosen to ignore this and are still adding obvious SEO/paid spam, I've disabled this account until you can respond.Sam Kuru (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sophia Khousadian moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Sophia Khousadian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources need to be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sophia Khousadian edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sophia Khousadian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bulklana (talk) 17:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sophia Khousadian for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Khousadian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Khousadian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply