VBH2010

September 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Amprgroup, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because you cannot have usernames that represent any "group". You will be blocked very soon if you continue editing on Wikipedia with that user name. Kindly do consider changing your name soon.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 14:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chuck Harmony production discography, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chuck Harmony production discography, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tonywalton ^Talk 00:42, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VBH2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was currently in the process of citing/updating Chuck Harmony's wikipedia page. The trouble is I was having issues with the HTML/coding I was not intentionally trying to cause any sort of vandalism, Im new to this whole thing. The reason I had removed the maintenance template each time I did, is because I thought I had fixed the citation.

Decline reason:

Massive WP:COI - you will need to use the {{unblock-spamun}} template and request a username change. That will not excuse you from Conflict of Interest. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would be willing to unblock, so long as there's a second opinion from another admin and you (the user) agree to edit the sandbox in the future if you're unsure about how something works. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I (the user) agree to edit the sandbox in the future. Amprgroup (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I concur with Magog, and agree that he can unblock you. I do ask that you make full use of your sandbox in article editing, that you make full use of the "show preview" button at the bottom of the text page, and that you waste no time in learning how the processes here work. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Please also note that as a PR company you have a severe conflict of interest.Teapotgeorge^Talk 11:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah -- and this account will probably draw a {{usernameblock}} as soon as it edits again. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

• I recommend not lifting the block. Request the user to change the user name. Regards. Wifione _....... ^{Leave a message} 14:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I see you (the user) have already put in a request to change your username; could you put in a separate request to change it to something not affiliated with the group? You'll want to add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} to your talk page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Amprgroup (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Amprgroup → VBH2010

I'll copy this text to WP:CHU for you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. When will I be able to edit again? Amprgroup (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

You can edit now. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I have re-blocked User:Amprgroup, that account should not be used to make edits. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 12:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Your edits on the Chuck Harmony article

I (and other editors) have reverted your change of the section name from "see also" to "discography". The section is not a discography. There is a link to a discography. It would be a discography section if and only if the section actually contained discography material rather than a link to a separate discography article with no other information.

I'd suggest that rather than fiddling with article formatting, what is needed is some actual referenced biographical infromation. As it is right now, it looks like a press release. -- Whpq (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nola Darling (Music Duo)

Hello, VBH2010, and thanks for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing whether the article Nola Darling (Music Duo) should be included in Wikipedia. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nola Darling (Music Duo) and you are welcome to comment there about why you think the article meets our criteria for inclusion.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Nola Darling (Music Duo), which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk. Thanks again! Steven Walling • talk 22:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nola Darling (Music Duo)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nola Darling (Music Duo) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)