Image tagging for Image:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage-2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage-2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


Image copyright problem with Image:WiznaJewishStreet.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:WiznaJewishStreet.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Hachalutz-Wizna-1925.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Hachalutz-Wizna-1925.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 04:01, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage-2.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beit-Hanan-2007-collage-2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 19:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:WiznaJewishStreet.jpg missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:WiznaJewishStreet.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wizna may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply