Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Bomai Ibrahim Mohammed a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Bomai Ibrahim Mohammed. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Bomai Ibrahim Mohammed
edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ambukar (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)drafts
editPlease do not move your own article drafts to mainspace, but wait for others to review them. First, this loses the opportunity for review by an experienced reviewer, and Ibrahim Mohammed Bomai certainly needed it. for it is written in strongly promotional language. Second, it messes up the cross reference structure of the encycopedia,vand rquires considerable fixing--thisis especially the case when you try, improperly, to merge the two versions. .As a reviewing administrator, focussing of problems with new articles, it will take me q. quite a while to fix..
- This is especially inappropriate given your declared conflict of interest. I shall either have to rewrite it compeltely, ort remove it entirely and let it be started over by someone without COI. DGG ( talk ) 07:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
edit
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DGG ( talk ) 07:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)