Your submission at Articles for creation: Altana Federal Credit Union (October 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! AltanaFCU, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Altana Federal Credit Union (November 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. DGG ( talk ) 05:29, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, AltanaFCU. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by   Bfpage |leave a message  01:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

November 2014 edit

 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 03:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply


advice edit

You asked me what would be needed for a viable article. You will need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. In practice, this turns out to be a difficult requirement to meet for credit unions and banks, except for the very largest. I personally might possibly be wiling to be more inclusive, but the community continues to go by WP:GNG as explained in WP:CORP. My responsibility is to give advice according to the community consensus. DGG ( talk ) 08:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply