Your submission at Articles for creation: Medical Schools Council (United Kingdom) (December 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:17, 24 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Medical Schools Council (United Kingdom) (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Alpha Charlie Bravo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 00:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Drchriswilliams. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Medical Schools Council without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You may have some well-sourced material to add to the article, but I would suggest doing this bit by bit. You should not simply remove all the well-sourced material that is already in an article. You may wish to use your edit summaries or the talk page to explain to other editors why you are removing or replacing certain material. Drchriswilliams (talk) 16:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Medical Schools Council (United Kingdom) concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Medical Schools Council (United Kingdom), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Katie Petty-Saphon

edit
 

The article Katie Petty-Saphon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Largoplazo (talk) 14:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply