Cecile Flapjack (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Hello! Thank you for the message, I enjoy seeing many exciting edits from you!Reply

Hey, Allthenope. Still trying to figure out using Wikipedia as an editor/writer myself. So just used to googling for little facts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitlinoeser (talkcontribs) 23:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Hi, Allthenope!

I reviewed your section on bell hooks and your edits were still there. The bit you added fit in find with the rest of the section, and I don't think anyone will delete it -- it is a relevant and important point to add on hooks' feminism. The flow of the added section is not a problem, nor are the grammar and punctuation. Excellent job! JG_StoCoNJ (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good Evening! I thought your edits were good. They were related to the topics we have talked about in class. On the contrary, I think that this is a very large topic and I would have liked to seen you edit a topic that needs more information on their page. Additionally, your references look great and they were in the correct style. Overall, good job. Seunathm (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.219.212 (talk) 00:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Feminine Mystique has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.