Allthemilescombined1

Welcome!

Hi Allthemilescombined1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you help review the block that was placed for copyright violations? I have made over 500 edits, all in good faith, bringing a significant contribution with only a tiny percentage of minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Allthemilescombined1! Your additions to Coagulation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for adding sources to other statements in the article! Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you please help review the block that was placed for copyright violations? I have made over 500 edits, all in good faith, bringing a significant contribution with only a tiny percentage of minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Your edit to Clinical pathology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to the article Crossword. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 22:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

I've found better sources for some of the things you added: New York Times and the New Yorker. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 10:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Minor Edits

Thanks for your recent edits; I can see you've been busy. You've been marking your edits as minor, but in many cases they're not. An edit should only be marked as minor if it's as trivial as a typo fix. It shouldn't be used when adding or removing references, content or templates. There's guidance at Help:Minor edit if you need. Cheers, AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 15:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. Minor in the scope of the universe, but not minor in the rules of this community. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 23:11, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you help me contest the block I received for copyright violations? I've made over 500 edits, they've all been in good faith, and I've contributed substantially to the project with what I think are a tiny percentage of very minor stumbles. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

further July 2024 copyright issues

Your edit to Blood transfusion has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Drchriswilliams (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi could you please explain why this edit was considered a violation? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transient myeloproliferative disease, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ERG and GATA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Who Are the Jews—And Who Can We Become?

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Who Are the Jews—And Who Can We Become? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jps.org/books/who-are-the-jews/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 02:12, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Hematology. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   — Diannaa (talk) 21:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Allthemilescombined1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have made over 500 good-faith edits and all of my work is in good faith. Please see my answers to the questions. :What is copyright? Copyright is the legal right to publish and otherwise use creative material and to authorize others to use the material. :· How is Wikipedia licenced? Under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). :· Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? Copyrighted content can only be legally published by the copyright holder or those authorized by the copyright holder. :· Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? If the writer has said that anyone can copy these things and make changes to them. :· How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? I will explain material in my own words.Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 22:06, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This misses WP:FAIRUSE but is otherwise pretty good. But I'm deeply, deeply concerned by your comments below. Given your statements below, you clearly don't understand the problems yet. Yamla (talk) 21:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

These answers are pretty accurate, but you were only blocked for 20 minutes before you posted your unblock request. Why should we trust you now? What's changed? — Diannaa (talk) 00:55, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Diannaa. Please explain what material in my edits violated the copyright policy. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

The policy says that unblock requests will be reviewed by an administrator other than the one who placed the block. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Here are two examples that are clear violations of our copyright policy. Matching content is marked in Bold:

On blood transfusion you added this:

In neonates, repeated RBC transfusions may lead to displacement of fetal hemoglobin by adult hemoglobin, which can contribute to hyperoxia at the cellular level. Transfusing preterm neonates with RBC concentrates obtained from umbilical blood is a strategy to increase hemoglobin concentration without depleting the physiologic HbF reservoir.

Source says:

Repeated red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in preterm neonates cause the progressive displacement of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) by adult hemoglobin. The ensuing increase of oxygen delivery may result at the cellular level in a dangerous condition of hyperoxia, explaining the association between low-HbF levels and retinopathy of prematurity or bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Transfusing preterm neonates with RBC concentrates obtained from allogeneic umbilical blood is a strategy to increase hemoglobin concentration without depleting the physiologic HbF reservoir.

On hematology, you added this:

First defined by the American Society of Hematology in 2015, systems-based hematology includes initiatives to deliver high-quality, evidence-based, cost-effective care to patients with blood disorders, through efforts to:

• improve stewardship in the diagnosis and management of complex blood disorders, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombophilia
• develop programs to promote appropriate use of blood products, inferior vena cava filters, anticoagulants and other hematologic therapies
• improve for accessing hematologic expertise through electronic consultation and disorder-specific care pathways

Source says:

First defined by the American Society of Hematology in 2015, the idea of a systems-based hematologist arose from evolving pressures in the health care system and increasing recognition of opportunities to optimize the quality and cost effectiveness of hematologic care. ... including efforts to improve stewardship in the diagnosis and management of complex hematologic disorders (eg, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombophilias), the development of programs to promote appropriate use of hematologic therapies (eg, blood products, inferior vena cava filters, and anticoagulation), changes in care delivery infrastructure to improve access to hematologic expertise (eg, electronic consultation and disorder-specific care pathways) ...

The section that says "deliver high-quality, evidence-based, cost-effective care to patients with blood disorders" (marked in green) is copied from here. — Diannaa (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. How can we send to another admin to judge whether the block is upheld? Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

You are listed in Category:Requests for unblock, which certain admins regularly patrol. But currently you are more likely to get your unblock request declined than accepted, because in spite of your good answers to my questions, your subsequent question "Please explain what material in my edits violated the copyright policy" shows that you don't actually understand what you did wrong. — Diannaa (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I believe the American Society of Hematology wants to raise awareness of the new field of systems-based hematology. I could request their permission. Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Allthemilescombined1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand now. I didn't think closely paraphrasing a very small percentage of the material I covered (less than 0.1%) would justify a permanent ban, when I contributed substantial improvements to the Wikipedia community by editing numerous articles that were significantly out of date, and in some cases had glaring errors. I regret that I paraphrased those scant few sentences and will do my very best to make sure I never make careless errors again, using extreme care at all times. Thank you for adding administrative review so I could get a broader perspective.Allthemilescombined1 (talk) 09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand now. I didn't think closely paraphrasing a very small percentage of the material I covered (less than 0.1%) would justify a permanent ban, when I contributed substantial improvements to the Wikipedia community by editing numerous articles that were significantly out of date, and in some cases had glaring errors. I regret that I paraphrased those scant few sentences and will do my very best to make sure I never make careless errors again, using extreme care at all times. Thank you for adding administrative review so I could get a broader perspective.[[User:Allthemilescombined1|Allthemilescombined1]] ([[User talk:Allthemilescombined1#top|talk]]) 09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand now. I didn't think closely paraphrasing a very small percentage of the material I covered (less than 0.1%) would justify a permanent ban, when I contributed substantial improvements to the Wikipedia community by editing numerous articles that were significantly out of date, and in some cases had glaring errors. I regret that I paraphrased those scant few sentences and will do my very best to make sure I never make careless errors again, using extreme care at all times. Thank you for adding administrative review so I could get a broader perspective.[[User:Allthemilescombined1|Allthemilescombined1]] ([[User talk:Allthemilescombined1#top|talk]]) 09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand now. I didn't think closely paraphrasing a very small percentage of the material I covered (less than 0.1%) would justify a permanent ban, when I contributed substantial improvements to the Wikipedia community by editing numerous articles that were significantly out of date, and in some cases had glaring errors. I regret that I paraphrased those scant few sentences and will do my very best to make sure I never make careless errors again, using extreme care at all times. Thank you for adding administrative review so I could get a broader perspective.[[User:Allthemilescombined1|Allthemilescombined1]] ([[User talk:Allthemilescombined1#top|talk]]) 09:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}