Allstuffs blogger

Your submission at Articles for creation: Worship Khanna (September 23)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Allstuffs blogger! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Praxidicae. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Worshipp Khanna, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop adding IWMBuzz. It should not be used for anything. It is just another wiki. Praxidicae (talk) 12:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Worshipp Khanna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worshipp Khanna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worshipp Khanna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 12:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

I've created a new article of Indian artist Worshipp Khanna yesterday but due to some lack in resources my article moved to process of deletion. Now I've provided enough citations for my article. I'm kindly requesting please don't delete the article and help me in publishing on Wikipedia.

Thank You...

Nomination of Worshipp Khanna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worshipp Khanna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worshipp Khanna (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Kanika Mann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kanika Mann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanika Mann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 15:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Your addition to Worshipp Khanna has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images. You must write your content in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.

• Image copyvio - https://www.fuzionproductions.com/worshipp-khanna-of-coldd-lassi-aur-chicken-masala-it-was-an-awesome-experience-working-under-pradeep-sarkar/ Begoon 08:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Worshipp Khanna. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 11:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your addition to Worshipp Khanna has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images. You must write your content in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.

• Copyvio image - https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/worshipp-khanna-bags-prominent-role-sethji-161107?amp
• Immediately stop adding copyright violations to wikipedia.
• Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. -- Begoon 11:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

One of your recent additions has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images. You must write your content in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing.

• You must think we are stupid. 2 more files which are clear Flickr-washing, same software and IDs in the exif. I'm losing patience with this. Try one more dishonest trick on this site and I will have you blocked here in the same way as you have now been blocked at Commons, quicker than you can blink. Understand? -- Begoon 16:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello Allstuffs blogger. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Allstuffs blogger. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Allstuffs blogger|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:38, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 13:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pyaar Ka Dard Hai Meetha Meetha Pyaara Pyaara, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 13:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Hello here, first of all I want to apologise for my mistakes. Also, my edits weren't paid promotions. I know my editing style was poor as I'm not a experienced editor. But still I want another chance for correction. I'm kindly requesting all Wikipedia administrators and editors to forgive me and help me to unblock my account because I have understood what I'm blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead; I will take care of Wikipedia terms and Conditions before contributing anything, Please help me to get my account back. Thank You}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 18:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Worship Khanna concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Worship Khanna, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Worship Khanna

Hello, Allstuffs blogger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Worship Khanna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Atlantic306 (talk) 01:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)