Welcome! edit

Hello, Allisonlee9, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 08:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

May 2016 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Deneb Karentz has been reverted.
Your edit here to Deneb Karentz was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw2F58Q1ckc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I thought I'd clarify the automated notice above. Typically links out to other websites nee to in references, rather than in the main text. Some pages retain a few external links from back in the early 2000s, but these days automated bots (like the one above) tend to remove them. Keep up the good work! T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 12:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Erin Pettit edit

Congratulations. Draft:Erin Pettit has been accepted and moved to its final location, Erin Pettit. You can see the histoy of collaboration on it here. Well done!
T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 00:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Copy and pasting edit

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

http://tylerprize.usc.edu/laureates/tyler2013.html

Jemma Wadham edit

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:02, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Steinberg has been accepted edit

 
Deborah Steinberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Message forwarded by T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 02:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Articles you contributed to have been nominated for Did You Know edit

Hello, Allisonlee9. The following articles that you've either created or significantly contributed to:

 have been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Cristina Takacs-Vesbach edit

  Hello! Your submission of Cristina Takacs-Vesbach at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 08:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Helen Fricker edit

On 1 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helen Fricker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Helen Fricker was a member of the first group to drill into an Antarctic subglacial lake? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Fricker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helen Fricker), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Section headings edit

I saw your recent edits at Jenny Baeseman. Among other things, you changed the section headings from "sentence case" (only the first word is capitalized, except for proper nouns) to "Title Case" (most words are capitalized.) I understand that instinct, but Wikipedia actually has guidelines for such things, and sentence case is the standards. I will take care of changing the headers in that article back to sentence case. Thanks for your efforts! --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:57, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jessica Melbourne-Thomas for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Melbourne-Thomas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Melbourne-Thomas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 05:29, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Delphine Lannuzel for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delphine Lannuzel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delphine Lannuzel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jemma Wadham for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jemma Wadham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jemma Wadham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Baum des Lichtes (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply