Edit warring at Ethereum edit

There is a discussion at Talk:Ethereum#Contentious editing where several editors disagree with your proposal to remove the fork issue from the lead. If you continue to revert, you are risking a block for WP:Edit warring. During the period from from May 7 through May 10 you reverted five times. It would be sensible for you to revert your last change until such time as you can persuade the others. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

EdJohnston - Please note that I've reverted the offending edit a total 5 times since May 7th: 2 of these edits were against user 92.237.175.241 and 3 were against user David Gerard. I don't think it's sensible for me to retract my last change as I've argued my case extensively without receiving a sensible response. I've sought consensus in good faith. My reversions are rationally justified according to Wikipedia content guidelines. It would be inappropriate and against the integrity of the article for me to cede ground on this issue. I think the page should be left devoid of the offending edit until cooler heads prevail. As such, I've taken this issue to the dispute resolution board to resolve this further or potentially await an intervention (please see my summary of the current situation). Aliensyntax (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Moderation edit

You say that it wasn't entirely clear how I was planning to conduct the moderation. Fine. You could wait and see. It should have been clear what I didn't want while I was trying to conduct moderation, including edit-warring of the article. I did tell all of the editors to read the rules. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Aliensyntax. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply