Alien from Afghanistan

April 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tajik people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Zyma (talk) 20:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tajik people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Eyesnore (pc) 20:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

It is removing recently added disputable, wild and unsourced information. There is NO history of Tajiks in South Asia and Britannica states that they make up one fifth of Afghanistan's population. [1] Those who brought Persian language and culture to South Asia (present day Pakistan and India) were ethnic Turks (Ghaznavids). There is also NO 1.2 million Tajiks in Pakistan. I have the right to remove this false and unsourced information and that is NOT vandalism.

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tajik people with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Alien from Afghanistan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Alien from Afghanistan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I just want to say

While I agree with you that LouisAragon has engaged in unacceptable, offensive behavior, please watch your step at ANI and be patient. If a thread there gets long enough it can really make getting any response from an administrator slow. And it's a slow hour for administrator activity right now anyway. I'd advise you to try doing something else for awhile. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 07:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Got you, thanks. I'm just going to wait for him to realize that he's just wrecking himself. He's angered by something and hope he changes but if not then he's going to regret all of this in the future.Alien from Afghanistan (talk) 08:03, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

—/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Side-note

Just a note that I'm just noticing you because I gave this notice to LouisAragon as well. As the template itself says, receipt of such notice is not an allegation that you've engaged in misconduct. It's just a notice that in articles related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, special sanction processes are available to any administrator. So please take special care in editing certain topics. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC)