April 2011

edit
 

Please do not create attack pages. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Pointillist (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Whinge wars

edit
 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Whinge wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Vishling.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Vishling.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Whinge wars

edit
 

The article Whinge wars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable, made-up game. Google search doesn't find anything describing this paper-based game (other than the original source website).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steamroller Assault (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Whinge wars for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whinge wars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whinge wars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Steamroller Assault (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Alicianpig, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Steamroller Assault (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alicianpig. Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 17:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Vishling.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.capohedz.com/typebrighter/2005/11/charlie-and-chocolate-factory-fraught.html. As a copyright violation, File:Vishling.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Vishling.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Vishling.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-en wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Vishling.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Vishling.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I should note that, while the image isn't directly taken from the link mentioned above, it was ultimately modified from a screen grab of a copyrighted film. Wyatt Riot (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wyatt Riot (talk) 17:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Uywwi

edit

Hello how are you? Uywwi (talk) 16:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

This was posted to your user page [1]; I moved it here.  Chzz  ►  17:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deleting non-notable articles and Whinge Wars

edit

I saw your thread at the village pump about deleting non-notable articles and I too have similar concerns. Sorry your article, Whinge Wars, got deleted. I was able to get a copy so I moved it to a safe place that doesn't delete things. You can find it here. I did a little work on the article and updated some stuff. You are welcome to continue working on the article there if you like. Cogitating (talk) 03:42, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from WikiAlpha. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gurt Posh (talk) 08:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

User:Alicianpig/Surveyjet.net

edit

Hi. :) Per your request, I've userfied this page to the above location. If you transwiki it to WikiAlpha or place it anywhere else, please remember to copy over the list of contributors in compliance with the licenses we use. When you are finished with it, please place {{db-u1}} (curly brackets and all) on it so that an admin can finish mop up, or just let me know (at my talk page, please) and I will. We can't keep those in user space for too long. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:WikiAlpha

edit
 

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiAlpha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yukon Gold hash for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yukon Gold hash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yukon Gold hash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. hacky (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply