Alexmce

IT'S NOT VANDALISM BECAUSE HE'S NOT A FUCKING PERSON JESUS.

Creating nonsense like Jim Downer twice IS vandalism.

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Jim Downer page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 05:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. Creating articles about people impregnating penguins is utter bleeding nonsense. Recreating the article after it was deleted does not change that. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not the place for people impregnating penguins. By what stretch of the imagination do you think it would be acceptable to create something like this? Dlohcierekim 05:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jim Downer

A tag has been placed on Jim Downer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 21:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Erica vonachen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. No more articles about your friends and classmates, please. See WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Danielle Coppola

A tag has been placed on Danielle Coppola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DJBullfish 19:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)