Notability of Monica foster edit

 

A tag has been placed on Monica foster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2010 edit

File copyright problem with File:Monica_foster_2009.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Monica_foster_2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Monica Foster edit

 

The article Monica Foster has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.


If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Tabercil (talk) 02:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

COI warning edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Monica Foster, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Morenooso (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Monica Foster edit

I have nominated Monica Foster, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Foster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tabercil (talk) 23:15, 13 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Monica foster.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Monica foster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

My edits edit

Saw your comment on my talk page and I just had to laugh. No, I do not have an agenda against adult entertainers. Let me point you to a few things:

  1. The Wikipedia:P*#Active\list of active participants in Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography
  2. The permission statement I got from Luke Ford way back when he was operating lukeisback.com for his photos, the bulk of which are porn stars.
  3. The images I got from Xcitement magazine which are present for use on Wikipedia.

I think that's enough said. Tabercil (talk) 03:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ma'am, besides the above I'm an administrator, that means I'm supposed to be maintaining order and enforcing the rules. One of these rules is Wikipedia's requirements about notability; if an article is deemed by the Wikipedia community as being non-notable, then it is supposed to be removed. That was why I nominated the article about Monica Foster for deletion, so the Wikipedia community as a whole can debate whether the subject is notable by our standards. And I might also point out that you are in a conflict of interest with regards to your own article - see Wikipedia:Autobiography. Tabercil (talk) 03:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
And just to let you know, I moved your comment from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rai to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priya Rai (2nd nomination). The first one is a long-closed debate which caused the article to be deleted the first time, and I believe it's the second one which is the current one which you had intended to vote on. Tabercil (talk) 04:34, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Monica foster 2009a.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monica foster 2009a.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ww2censor (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative edit

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi AlexandraMayers! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of User:AlexandraMayers/MonicaFoster edit

  User:AlexandraMayers/MonicaFoster, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AlexandraMayers/MonicaFoster and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:AlexandraMayers/MonicaFoster during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 09:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply