Alexandar Garcia
Say "Hi" if you are here edit
... Alexandar Garcia (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Problems ? edit
Type Here ... Alexandar Garcia (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
National varieties of English edit
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Bored Ape, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for any confusion or offense caused by my recent edit to the page Bored Ape. I understand that Wikipedia has readers from all over the world and our policy is to respect national varieties of English in articles. I will make sure to adhere to this policy in the future and use the appropriate form of English depending on the subject, country and original author. I apologize for any inconvenience caused and I will make sure to follow the guidelines outlined in the Manual of Style. I appreciate your bringing this to my attention and if I have any further questions I will reach out to you or visit the help desk. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 23:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023 edit
Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sakine Cansız without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry dear, I made a mistake while doing the copy edit, I accidentally removed the content from Sakine Cansız. Since you had already changed the edits, I'm thankful to you for bringing it to my attention. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 23:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from V. M. Ummer Master. Redlinks are useful and can often be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.
In addition, clicking on the "What links here" link (in the tools listed at the left in desktop view) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the assistance. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 07:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
National varieties of English edit
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Legends Outlets Kansas City, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my actions. I came across this article in my suggestions and noticed some grammar errors, so I attempted to make corrections. Although I felt that my corrections were not bad, I appreciate your decision to revert them. I will be more cautious in the future and take care of these things. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 23:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Having been warned about this, you went on and changed 'organizations' and 'organizes' to 'organisations' and 'organises' in the Global Environment Outlook article since your message. Why? And your other edits are problematic. I have reverted most of your recent edits because they made the articles worse, introducing errors. I appreciate your enthusiasm, but Wikipedia:Competence is required and it is counter-productive if someone has to come along and undo your 'improvements'. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience caused by the change in terminology from "Organizations" to "Organisations" in the article. I understand now that this was not in line with the preferred terminology and I regret any confusion this may have caused. I will make sure to keep this in mind going forward and exercise caution when editing articles to ensure consistency and accuracy in our content. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- You did this again minutes after typing that response. If you don't understand the difference between British and American English, please do not attempt to correct what you take to be spelling errors in articles on the English Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 09:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience caused by the change in terminology from "Organizations" to "Organisations" in the article. I understand now that this was not in line with the preferred terminology and I regret any confusion this may have caused. I will make sure to keep this in mind going forward and exercise caution when editing articles to ensure consistency and accuracy in our content. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Alexandar Garcia (talk) 07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet edit
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.