Welcome! edit

Hello, Alex Pinkerton! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

New message from CASSIOPEIA edit

 
Hello, Alex Pinkerton. You have new messages at WP:TH.
Message added 07:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Alex Pinkerton, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Alex Pinkerton! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Problem with your custom signature edit

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 05:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Warning edit

This is a warning for disruptive editing. Page moving without consensus in the talk page is a kind of vandalism; and you did this more than three times now. UserNumber (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I understand. Although it seemed time consuming. Anyway, the way you spelled the word Dhakaiya is not right, as it includes an unnecessary 'y' in the middle. I get it, it's how it has been going on over the years and nobody ever tried to talk about it. Ask yourself pronouncing that word in Bengali—is not the 'i' in the middle sufficient enough to do the job?
Unnecessary inclusions only weaken logical standpoint of a thing's overall construction.
And also, you're making বাকরখানি sound as বাকারখানি in English with the way you titled that page. These ways of transcribing/transliterating names from languages that fail to showcase an unaltered pronunciation just as they are in the original language need to be addressed. Even if a great amount of time has been passed and nobody ever raised any attention. Weed out-er (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know what you mean that Bakarkhani should be spelt as Bakorkhani, but this is in Bengali. English transcription takes it from Hindi/Sanskrit unfortunately, and so in the English language, Bakarkhani is the default. Sadly we can't change that, if you search Bakarkhani in Google it gives more search results.
On the other hand, Dhakaiya spelling is right. ঢা (Dha) + কা (ka) + ই (i) + য়া (ya).
If you want it to change, you can start a conversation in the talk pages.UserNumber (talk) 10:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Why? Isn't 'Bakorkhani' a cuisine originating from Bangladesh? If so, then taking its transliteration from the Hindi/Sanskrit counterpart would be ridiculous. And it doesn't matter what Google searches speak about that, as Google search offer nothing more than showing what has been going on for ever since, like a 'trend' (like as much as any blind 'tradition' or 'customary'), and needless to say, this can never be a logical way to establish the validity of facts.
But if it is the other way around, by which I mean, if 'Bakorkhani' is originally not a Bangladeshi cuisine, then it can be 'Bakarkhani', or something else. It must follow the language of the country where it originated from, to acquire a valid romanized name in English.
And now speaking about the other matter, the Dhakaiya matter – If your analogy was right then 'বুয়েটিয়ান' should have been spelled as 'Buetiyan', which is not. It is 'Buetian'. To provide more support for my analogy, take a look at how 'Australian', 'Brazilian', 'Russian', 'Italian', 'Spaniard', 'ASEAN', etc. are spelled as. What you are doing is simply making things complex by bringing another 'y' to do the job which 'i' has already done before that 'y' even made its appearance.
Just pay a look and simply think in an analytical way to grasp the concept. The English alphabet 'y' is logically brought in to construct transcriptions or romanization of a word only as an alternative of 'i' in some cases to do the same job as 'i'—which is the job of showcasing the sound 'ee-' (International Phonetic Alphabet: ɪ) being followed by an oppositional vowel. As a simple example: Yard.
With due respect, brother, you might require some extensive study on the field of linguistics, to see where I'm coming from, if not yet. Weed out-er (talk) 03:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
I agree, it is ridiculous. But I don't make the rules here. UserNumber (talk) 17:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
~ sigh ~ Weed out-er (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply