Welcome

edit

Hi, Alarichus. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  14:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
ようこそ
  • You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.
  • Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.
  • Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.
  • When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

--  Chzz  ►  14:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles

Award

edit
  The Exceptional Newcomer Award
Fantastic work on Snorri Thorfinnsson, especially the family tree.

Great to have you as a Wikipedian!

thnx --Alarichus (talk) 13:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Snorri Thorfinnsson

edit

I've given the article a brief clean- it could do with some more categories, and especially some more details about his life. What did he do in life? When/how did he die? I've upgraded it to start class, but some more information about his life would be needed before it could be considered a C class or B class. For instance, it's not really clear what makes him a significant figure. You're welcome to contact me on my talk page or rejoin the help channel if you need any more help. J Milburn (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll see what more is there for him --Alarichus (talk) 15:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Snorri Thorfinnsson

edit
  On July 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Snorri Thorfinnsson, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 14:15, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations! Your first did you know. Hopefully there will be many more to follow :) J Milburn (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks :) --Alarichus (talk) 17:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help....

edit

Hello there - I made the changes you suggested and wanted to know if you could take a look at my subpage again to see if there was any other changes/additions that needed to be made. Clairetastic (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sure. --Alarichus (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Almost there...I think

edit

So I added more references, internal links and the musicians infobox you told me about. How do I actually add the photo? What other changes do I need to make? Once I am done, how do I move the article and publish it? Thank you so much again for your help. Clairetastic (talk) 23:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

To upload the photo click here . Follow the instructions on that page. To publish the article click here . Just copy/paste the content from your sandbox. Every time you want to write an article that does not exist, just search for the title of the article in wiki. If it doesn't exist, you will see above the search results "You may create the page "xyz", but consider checking the search results below to see whether it is already covered". Then just click the link. --Alarichus (talk) 23:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ernesto Basile

edit

I have posted questions at Template_talk:Did_you_know#Ernesto_Basile regarding the wording of the hook, the image and the reference used. Please respond at your earliest convenience. Binksternet (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sure. --Alarichus (talk) 16:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

IRC

edit

Sorry I missed the end of our chat; I had a ph call. Yes, anyone can review DYK.

I tried to send you a memo on IRC, but couldn't because your account on IRC is not registered - you probably want to register it. Type /msg nickserv help in IRC for info.  Chzz  ►  20:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Buy, Buy Baby

edit

I replied on the DYK page. Theleftorium 22:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replied again. Theleftorium 08:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
And again. :P Theleftorium 09:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

You have new messages at...

edit
 
Hello, Alarichus. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Kingpin13 (talk) 10:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Licensing question

edit

If I have a photo of Brian Riordan that was shot by his friend who is a photographer and they are for Brian to use for press and articles. I don't know what type of license to use. Thanks Clairetastic (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Use this one [1].

And choose one of the free licenses.--Alarichus (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article you asked me to look at

edit

Hey, I just added some commas, apostrophes, and generally fixed some minor stuff in the article you asked me to look at. One part I thought was funky (which may have been brought up in the peer review, I don't know, because I haven't read it) is the line that reads, "fending off one invader or other and quelling rebellions". I think maybe it could be changed to "fending off multiple invasion attempts" or something. "One invader or other" sounds a bit awkward.

Also, the phrase that says, "came to fruition in his promulgation of the Constitutions of Melfi" sounds like it may have been plagiarized. I'm not saying you did it, but that whoever did should probably be careful. I read through the whole thing, mostly looking for punctuation and grammar stuff. I found a few things. I also split the "See also" section into two columns. Feel free to remove that if you don't think it is a good idea. The article is looking good. Killiondude (talk) 01:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

None of those phrases was written by me. They are from the 12k version of the article. I should have changed them earlier. Thnx for pointing it out. :).--Alarichus (talk) 08:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, I fixed those two phrases, what else, needs to be improved? --Alarichus (talk) 08:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Existing page

edit

Ok so I have read through the article and uploaded the photo and think I am all set and ready to publish. Is there anything else I need to add and/or edit? I see that there was a page for Brian Riordan but it has been deleted. Is it ok to paste in that page? Will it still publish? Thanks Clairetastic (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The previous version of the article was deleted because it was considered advertising. The current version(the one you wrote), is not advertising. So I suggest you go on and copy/paste it. If you want to discuss this issue with the admin who deleted it, join the IRC channel of english wikipedia [2]. His username is Closedmouth. --Alarichus (talk) 18:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your presumably semi-automated edits

edit

I don't know what you're trying to do with edits like this one, but it seems to have broken template parameters, capitalization ("20Th"), and category sorting. If you don't explain, I will rollback all of these edits. --NE2 18:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

It was probably some mistake of the MOS fix. Thnx for telling me. It fixes without problem MOS issues in plain text and refs, but has problems in templates sometimes. Thnx for telling me, I will be careful not to choose template parts next time.--Alarichus (talk) 18:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Can you explain which part of the manual of style you are applying? I see no substantive changes. --NE2 18:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
MOS changes don't necessarily have to be "substantial" as you say. Space fixes, alphabetical categorizing of language categories, etc. are MOS fixes. --Alarichus (talk) 18:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
And which of those did you do here? All I see, other than the errors, is some spacing changes, which I don't believe the MOS has anything about. --NE2 18:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
It fixed the double spaces issues, didn't it?I accidentally probably chose a template part or a similar one. You saw a mistake? Fix it. --Alarichus (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
What "double spaces issues" are these? I do plan to fix it, by reverting all of these edits, but figured I'd talk with you first to make sure that's the best course of action. --NE2 19:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn' suggest that because you would also revert the corrections, which are the majority. I suggest manual edits on the template parts of the articles which have such issues. --Alarichus (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
You have yet to show me any "corrections". All I see is addition of spacing, which is not prescribed in any way by the MOS. --NE2 19:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Double spaces between sections are against wiki guidelines. But if you want to rollback them, do it.--Alarichus (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Where in [3] did you remove double spaces? --NE2 19:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sections and their headings should have only one space between them. In the article most of them had 2 spaces. --Alarichus (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
You're going to have to tell me which section, since I don't see any double spacing in this old revision. --NE2 19:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
It added spaces between all titles of headings and ==. In the upper missisipi saparated with space image and template check in the riverback section for double space etc... This is getting pointless, if you want to rollback, just rollback. I am not interested in the issue. There more important things in wiki, than discussing spaces. --Alarichus (talk) 19:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it added spaces, which is pointless. However, it doesn't seem to have removed any double spacing. I'm rolling back now; please don't make such edits again. --NE2 19:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
I won't. I thought this integrated firefox fixer worked, obviously it is a bit pointless.--Alarichus (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ernesto Basile

edit
  On August 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ernesto Basile, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 02:15, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Please use edit summaries

edit

Hi there. Could you please remember to leave edit summaries? It's more important than you may realize. Thanks. -- œ 18:34, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I do remember their usage, its just that most times, I'm the only one expanding an article, so I leave a summary when I finish editing the article in its entirety. Anyways, thnx for reminding me. --Alarichus (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Jan Ligthart

edit

Hello Alarichus. Would you consider to mark your articles with {{underconstruction}} tag? This version of the article Jan Ligthart is almost empty and someone could to nominate it for speedy deletion as an article with almost no content. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I guess you were late 1min. I added the { {underconstruction} } tag, 1min ago. :)--Alarichus (talk) 08:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
In that case, I honestly apologize. Keep up the good work, Alarichus. --Vejvančický (talk) 08:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
No problem. :D--Alarichus (talk) 08:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ramon Santamarina

edit
  On August 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ramon Santamarina, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jake Wartenberg 11:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

GAR

edit

Thanks, matey :). Ironholds (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you pass a GA, use the page parameter to indicate the page, "1", not the subtopic on the GAN page. Thanks. Hekerui (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Vikos-Aoos National Park

edit

Thank you for your time reviewing Vikos-Aoos National Park. I will make the appropriate corrections/additions in the next hours.Alexikoua (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

According to the review page, the article passes the quick fail criteria (as per [4]], the 6 criteria for nomination are checked just after the article passes quick fail criteria assessment). I can't understand why it wans't put 'on hold' for a short period in order to make readjustments &corrections.Alexikoua (talk) 05:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Because it didn't pass the neutrality and verifiability criteria to an extent that would require major editing. When it is improved, it can be nominated again. --Alarichus (talk) 08:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Charles of Lorraine-Commercy

edit

I found some apparent oddities regarding his usual titles (with caveats: I am NOT a specialist of 17th century Frenh nobility). I've left comments on te talk page. The primary problem is that he seems not to have been referred as "Lorraine-Commercy" at all by the French, nor much by the referenced titles. This makes researching him in French from the indications in the article very difficult. Circeus (talk) 02:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I answered in the talk page --Alarichus (talk) 08:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Francesco Torniello

edit
  On September 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Francesco Torniello, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 11:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


Names in Marble

edit

Hello, Alarichus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Names in Marble, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ScythreTalkContribs 11:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC) ScythreTalkContribs 11:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Scythe, I think you used the wrong template. I'm not a new user. I have 5 dyk, and 1 ga. And I have created 6-7 articles. I have added { {underconstruction} } on Names in Marble. Dont be quick to judge before running a google search, if you are not familiar with the subject. This is one of the most popular books in estonian literature. During Soviet rule it was banned. There is a film about it which in 2002 became a major box office hit in Estonia. :) --Alarichus (talk) 12:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Template:Northern Epirus

edit

I wonder why a number of articles was removed from this template, since there are enough sources to point out that they are relevant with the title (Greek populations in that towns etc, their polyphonic tradition...). During the last weeks two users (7 times blocked in 2 months) User:I_Pakapshem and (6 times blocked in 2 months) User:Sarandioti, use systematiccaly irc [[5]], since they have received a revert limit on such issues due to edit warring, wp:npa, wp:incivility. (I have a number of emails that confirm their activity in irc, as their only means to receive attention).Alexikoua (talk) 06:00, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

User:I_Pakapshem, has asked assistance mainly in uploading images several times. Some users in the irc have provided such assistance. He joined the channel, and expressed his concerns regarding the template. I do understand your concerns, however, the issue must be checked neutrally. The polyphonic songs part was removed because it is not a distinct elemnt of the greek community. Some of the settlements were also removed, because there were no references, indicating a greek community in them, and because in two cases, the reference was not reliable. I would suggest also, to explain thoroughly in which settlements the greek community is a minority and in which it isn't.--Alarichus (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I will contribute in the teplate's talk page. Actually this geographic region is of multi-national background (mainly Albanian, Vlach & Greek), according to 'rs' bibliography. According to my view a template about a minority's geographical&cultural background doesn't exclude the other local national elements in the same area.Alexikoua (talk) 08:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Concerns

edit

Seems that this deletion template is also mentioned in a really disturbing way off-wiki too. I really regret the way a specific user with no contribution (revert and advocating in incident boards isn't off course contribution) and disturbing past continues a childish (today also provocative) activity.

I will post some more information in admins noticeboard. Moreover, I wish some other users had a greater variety of interests in wiki and not only creating battlegrounds on nationalistic issues.Alexikoua (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Charles of Lorraine-Commercy

edit
  On September 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles of Lorraine-Commercy, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

:D--Alarichus (talk) 10:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Names in Marble

edit
  On September 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Names in Marble, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

:D--Alarichus (talk) 12:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Battle of Parkany

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Battle of Parkany at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit

A sockpuppetry case has been opened against you here: [6]. --Athenean (talk) 04:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

edit

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Battle of Podhajce (1667)

edit
  On September 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Podhajce (1667), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 00:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

:D--Alarichus (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edits

edit

Since I was blocked for a being a sock of someone, who hasn't even edited, I'll just post any edits I want to do here, and hopefully if anyone regards them as reasonable will do the edits for me. --Alarichus (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I suggest you file an unblock request. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
You should post any unblock request on your primary account. Checkuser confirms that you used this account to evade a block and editing restrictions, and this account has been blocked indefinitely as a result. Nathan T 15:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
This is my one and only account. That guy had a 1 revert per week on balkans related articles. I don't even edit such articles. I only have 2 edits on such articles. --Alarichus (talk)
As far as I am concerned, if this account edits different articles and does everything properly, if there is no HARD smoking gun evidence they are the same person, this account should not be blocked. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
(ec) There is hard, smoking gun evidence, namely the checkuser. 5 admins (Nishkid64, J delanoy, Future Perfect at Sunrise, EdJohnston, MuZemike) all concur that it is him beyond reasonable doubt. And he has edited Balkans articles with this account, such as this one [7]. Not to mention he was highly tendentious and disruptive in the deletion debate for that template. --Athenean (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please see my comments on the current ANI thread. I must say that on reviewing this I am no longer convinced of the sock case. My apologies to everybody for not looking into it more thoroughly in the beginning. Fut.Perf. 21:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I am not related to Sarandioti. He has been blocked more than 5 times, I haven't even been warned on blocking issues. --Alarichus (talk)

Articles

edit

I will just write articles here, until I get unblocked and then copy/paste them. Thank you. --Alarichus (talk) 18:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Historia Naturalis Brasiliae

edit
Historia Naturalis Brasiliae in qua non tantum plantae et animalia, sed et indigenarum morbi, ingenia et mores describuntur et iconibus supra quingentas illustrantur
 
Historia Naturalis Brasiliae
AuthorWillem Piso, Georg Marcgrave
IllustratorFrans Post, Albert Eckhout
Cover artistFrans Post
LanguageLatin
SubjectMedical and natural history of Brazil
Genremedical
PublisherFranciscus Hackius
Publication date
1648
Publication placeDutch Republic

Historia Naturalis Brasiliae written by Willem Piso and Georg Marcgrave was the first medical and botanical book about Brazil. It was published in 1648 in the Dutch Republic by Franciscus Hackius.

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

edit

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Battle of Parkany

edit
  On September 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Parkany, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal talk ¤ 07:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

:D indeed.--Alarichus (talk) 10:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

edit

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

New article to be reviewed

edit

Greetings! I am submitting an article I've worked on to be peer reviewed. If possible, could you please take the time to look it over? It's the first one I've ever submitted for peer review. Thanks! Here it is: Madeleine de La Tour d'Auvergne Ruby2010 (talk) 04:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

edit
 

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

edit

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

edit

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

edit

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

edit

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

edit

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Coordinator elections have opened!

edit

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

edit

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

edit

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Alarichus. You are invited to participate in WP:Peer review#Age of Discovery. Thank you.--Uxbona (talk) 18:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

edit

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

edit

The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

edit
 

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:55, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Milhist election has started!

edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Párkány

edit

I see you were a major contributor to this article. I am afraid currently it should be delisted as B-class (see rationale at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Requests#Requests_for_assessment], primary issue is insufficient referencing), but perhaps you'd like to make some edits to address those issues? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Names in Marble.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Names in Marble.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily

edit

Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply