Alanchar1978

Welcome!

Hello, Alanchar1978, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Focus Management Consultants Limited, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Focus Management Consultants Limited

The article Focus Management Consultants Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This business article doesn't pass Wikipedia:Notability (companies) or WP:GNG as written presently. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Help

Im really struggling to make the right corrections and someone help please?

Hi Alanchar1978. Okay, here's what you need to do:

• Start by finding sources. Wikipedia will only keep articles which are supported by reference to multiple, reliable, independent sources. That's:

• multiple - at least three, usually
• reliable - published in an editorially oversighted form (so no blogs, wikis or self-published books/magazines)
• and independent - not affiliated with the subject (no press releases, interviews, pages from FMC's website etc.)

• Once you have these sources, cite them in the article.
• Take out anything that could be considered as promotional - your article isn't actually too bad, although I'd remove "leading" and "specialist" from the first sentence.
• Trim the list of external links - whilst FMC's website is appropriate as a link, the rest are not (you may, however, be able to use some of these as sources).

The sourcing is the most important one - deal with that and deletion is off the table. Then you can start building the article up.

Hope that helps. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Help

Ok thank you so much I have edited your points and hope this is now compliant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.21.162 (talk) 10:44, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

I apologise - it's not, but that's my fault rather than yours. I neglected to mention one other vital element of finding sources - they must include significant coverage of the subject. The two sources you've added are a start, but they only mention FMC in passing, and therefore don't fulfil the requirements of Wikipedia's content guidelines.

What you need is something like a newspaper or magazine article that has around 200 words or a couple of paragraphs on FMC and their activities. For an example of an article on a similar company, have a look at the sources on Hays plc - there's information from The Financial News, The Glasgow Herald, BBC News, The Telegraph and The Independent, all of which have published articles that contain a reasonable amount of information about Hays. That's the kind of thing you should be looking for.

It's also worth noting at this juncture that FMC might simply not meet Wikipedia's inclusion requirements - many companies don't. That's no reflection on them as a business, merely a statement that Wikipedia's fairly narrow and specific content guidelines do exclude rather a lot of topics. We aren't try to create an indiscriminate collection of information - some stuff just doesn't go in. If you can't find suitable sources for FMC, then they probably don't warrant an article here yet. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Help

Thanks new source added, i will en-devour to find more and provide them soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.21.162 (talk) 13:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

If you cannot find the right sources, you can ask for the article to be userfied to your sandbox for further editing in the future; this will ensure that the work you've put so far is not wasted. I'd strongly encourage you to try to gain experience editing other articles. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)