Welcome!

edit

Hi Alan191919! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! HouseBlastertalk 01:54, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Red Paintings have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing The Red Paintings due to disruptive editing and edit warring. If you engage in any further disruption of the Articles for Deletion debate, or anywhere else, you will be blocked from all of Wikipedia. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. You must also comply with the mandatory Paid contributions disclosure. This is not negotiable. Cullen328 (talk) 02:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I do believe that is an unfair block considering I was calling out broken sources links and obviously unreliable sources that had had created new information's on the page in the last week. Have you even checked the source links in question? The page is full of misleading information warranting a deletion. I will take my facts to higher and unbias Wikipedia admins. Alan191919 (talk) 02:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
For example how can you explain these two sources? #
  1. ^ "twofishoutofwater.com is for sale | HugeDomains". Alan191919 (talk) 02:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
You clearly have some positive things to offer in discussions about this band but you have gone about this in an excessively aggressive and combative fashion. Being correct is not a valid defense against edit warring. This is crystal clear. Edit warring is forbidden whether the edits are incorrect or correct. I am acting as an administrator in this matter, not a content editor. So, this discussion is not about the content. This is about your behavior. This is a collaborative project and you will not be allowed to ram or jam through your preferred edits or deletion of the articles. You must persuade and convince your fellow editors. Instead, you are alienating them. I also note that you have not yet complied with the mandatory WP:PAID. If you make any further edits without full compliance, you will be blocked project wide. I hope that is clear to you. Cullen328 (talk) 04:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
There's isn't a hierarchy of Admins with one group being in charge of another. Cullen328 is correct. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editing on your own or someone else's behalf

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for more information.

Wikipedia's policy on how to handle material about living persons, biographies of living persons, applies to every page on the project, including talk pages. If Wikipedia has published material about you, or someone you represent, and you need help, you can:

`

"All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking."

Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs on talk. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply