Akikormin125
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cad Crowd, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cad Crowd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cadcrowdcorporatelogo.png edit
Thanks for uploading File:Cadcrowdcorporatelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Akikormin125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't sock, vandalize or cross edit. I used two different accounts to create in one and another to edit. There was no retaliation, that account had nothing to do with my afd. How lany editors are you blocking because they came across a protected paid editor? You can't defend 5 afd's without revealing all the sock and meat puppetry going on this platform. Honestly dont appreciate you violating my right to privacy either. Now you have blabbed and i will need to create another account to edit with so my page creation acct doesnt get retaliated against.
Decline reason:
Since you intend to evade your block, there is nothing else to discuss. 331dot (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akikormin125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I meant once I am unblocked, privacy is important. Otherwise I wouldn't tell you.. I am trying to inform you in advance so I don't get blocked for socking again since there is no actual real review.
Decline reason:
This is dumb. We're not going to argue with a confirmed sock who's threatening to continue to sock. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.