Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Akhaitan71, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shlok 10:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Khaitan Public School

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Advait.kansal (talk) 06:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop vandalism

edit

Please stop your persistent vandalism of the page Khaitan Public School, Ghaziabad.Advait.kansal (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit
edit

I don't think the messages above have been as helpful as they might have been. Instead of accusing you of vandalism, which I don't think is accurate, it would have been better to have explained to you what the problems were.

  • It is clear that you are editing on behalf of a school, and that your aim is to ensure that Wikipedia shows that school in a favourable light. Wikipedia aims to give neutral coverage to subjects, as they appear from an independent, outside, perspective. Wikipedia is not a medium for organisations or businesses to promote the view of themselves that they would like to be known: that is for your own website to do.
  • Since you are connected to the topic you have written about, you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. (To avoid the possibility of a surprisingly common misunderstanding, editing is part of paid work if it is done as part of normal employment or as part of a work to a contract, whether or not a specific payment earmarked for editing Wikipedia is made.) JBW (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akhaitan71. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Khaitan Public School, Ghaziabad for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khaitan Public School, Ghaziabad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khaitan Public School, Ghaziabad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 09:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply