Welcome!

Hello, Akbaralighazi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Quadzilla99 (talk) 06:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dameli has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/khowaracademy/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Khowar Wikipedia for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khowar Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khowar Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Postoronniy-13 (talk) 01:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Badshah Munir Bukhari

edit
Dear User:Akbaralighazi, thank you for your comment on the article, Badshah Munir Bukhari. If you are sure that what you say is correct, you are free to nominate the article for deletion, or at least to add a template that expresses your concerns about its notability. You would have to be specific in your assessment. The Wikipedia community of editors might not agree with you, but then again it might. Regards,George Custer's Sabre (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Badshah Munir Bukhari‎

edit

Hello User:Akbaralighazi. I hope you are well. Please read the Badshah Munir Bukhari‎ article and tell me if anything clearly false statements (in your assessment) remain. I have only deleted information that is unreferenced or not supported by the evidence. You are welcome to edit the page yourself, of course. Best wishes,George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good morning Akbaralighazi. I am doing my best to ensure that the page complies with WP:BLP guidelines. Please feel free to assist by editing the page as well, comforming, of course, with those WP:BLP guidelines. Thank you.George Custer's Sabre (talk) 07:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Khowar Academy for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khowar Academy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khowar Academy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removing AfD template

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Khowar Academy. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  13:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

You have been blocked indefinitely for abusing multiple accounts per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akbaralighazi. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chetraro Hawaz (Voice of Chitral) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chetraro Hawaz (Voice of Chitral) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chetraro Hawaz (Voice of Chitral) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 18:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yak Misraee Nazm for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yak Misraee Nazm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yak Misraee Nazm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 10:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Khowar poetry

edit

 Template:Khowar poetry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Greenbörg (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Khot Valley

edit

Hello Akbaralighazi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khot Valley for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Significa liberdade (talk) 01:37, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Khot Valley moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Khot Valley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply