June 2011

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Food Lion, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Laminin. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Bluefist talk 22:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ouija. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Speedy deletion nomination of How to be a witch

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as How to be a witch, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 03:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

July 2012

edit

  Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at White chocolate. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 03:39, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 03:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply