Ainakan
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot edit
|
Hi Ainakan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
I notice that you tagged the page Gbemi Olateru-Olagbegi for speedy deletion under CSD A7. While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because, besides the various indications of importance in the text, the article contains reliable sources, which is the most fundamental indication of importance and article can make, since the 'higher standard of notability looks to whether sources have written about a subject. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, propose the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or take the page to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for discussion on the merits. Thanks!
Speedy deletion declined: Fuji music edit
Hello Ainakan. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fuji music, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article about a genre, not a musician or band, doesn't qualify for A7 speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 28 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Olatunde olalekan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Background and NIMR
- Adekunle Ajasin University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ondo
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
December 2013 edit
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Isaac Newton because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - DVdm (talk) 13:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Olatunde olalekan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Olatunde olalekan isaac.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Olatunde olalekan isaac.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Olatunde isaac.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Olatunde isaac.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Olatunde olalekan edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Olatunde olalekan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DVdm (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Regarding Speedy Deletion
- Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
- I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.
- Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written about the subject.
- Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
- Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
- If you want to try again, consider using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process and use the following links to find sources.Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.
- Please see the following links that will be helpful in editing.
|
|
PS-- I would strongly recommend against recreating this w/o reliable sources with verifiable info. The seeming sources that were actually to wikipedia articles that did not support the content gave a false air of significance to the subject. I would strongly recommend against doing that again. Wikipedia articles may not be used to source articles. Dlohcierekim 22:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Your edits, edit
while seemingly intended to be helpful are actually becoming disruptive. You need to not review pages and tag for deletion until you've had more experience with general editing. Thanks, Dlohcierekim 22:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Isaacatm. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 08:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dlohcierekim 08:18, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
Ainakan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Sequel to the blockage of my user page and the proposed of the article:Olatunde olalekan I created,I hereby write with the sense of commitment and responsibility as a contributors to wikipedia to inform you that the destructive editting made with my user ip and username was done by my son without my consent and the page I created(olatunde olalekan) has nothing to to with the user/isaacatm. I took it as a point of responsiblity to create the page when I discovered that user/isaac atm was making a destructive creation of the page. Actualy I left my device(computer) open without logging out of wikipedia and my son had access to make a destructive edits on several page,without my consen. And before I discoered this indecent act,my user page has been blocked and my article has been tag for speedy deletion. On this note Ikindly unblock my user page/Ainakan and restore the page I created since all this edit was done without my consent so as not to seem insensitive. Thanks for your anticipation
Decline reason:
Well then, since I have to trust you, I assume you are telling the truth about this, and thus since the account is admittedly compromised it will have to remain blocked forever. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(Ainakan (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2013 (UTC))
- Comment No way. The extend of your edits, taken as a whole, is in no way attributable to a momentary lapse and the use of your account by anyone else. Not formally denying as I am involved. Dlohcierekim 17:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Ainakan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My able and competent wikipedian,with all sincerety am not aware of all the edits by my son. He even went as far as editing sir isaac newton page.u can imagine such a destructive act. And let me remind you that no one is above a mistake. I bears the blame of all that has happen.give me a room to convince you. And let me also remind you that it will be quiet unethical to deal with issues like this with sentiment. I have apologise and also on my son behalf. Such will never repeat tiself again. Thanks distinguish wikipedian
Decline reason:
See above. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.