Welcome!

Hello, Aidybarnett! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meta-research has been accepted

edit
 
Meta-research, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Science magazine cover Sep 2018.gif

edit
 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Science magazine cover Sep 2018.gif

edit
 

The file File:Science magazine cover Sep 2018.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free cover art being used in a decorative manner in Metascience (research)#History. Non-free cover art is generally considered acceptable when it's used at the top of or in the main infobox of a stand-alone article about the work in question, but it's much harder to justify its non-free use when it's used in other articles or in the body of an article as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3. Permission from the copyright holder is only needed when the file is being released under a free license; it's completely irrelevant when it comes to non-free content. The cover art itself is not the subject of any sourced critical commentary, and the reader doesn't need to see any non-free image yet alone this particular image to understand that the subject is either being taken "seriously" or was covered in "one of the world's most important journals"; so, the context required for non-free use by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science (February 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 02:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aidybarnett! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 02:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023

edit

  Hello, Aidybarnett. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science (March 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eejit43 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~ Eejit43 (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science (May 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RPSkokie (talk) 13:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Insufficient sourcing to meet NORG - coverage existing is routine in nature and does not cover the subject in sufficient depth to warrant an article.
MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:58, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science

edit

  Hello, Aidybarnett. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-Research and Open Science, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply