Aidemsup

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kunji Kalathappam (August 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kunji Kalathappam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kunji Kalathappam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Aidemsup! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 16:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, this draft has been deleted three times so far, each time as blatant promotion, so be aware that this will be a challenge for a relatively inexperienced editor. You say you have no conflict of interest, and I'll assume good faith on that, although I do wonder why you have chosen to write about a random businessman you don't know.

The draft isn't protected from recreation yet, so you can create the draft, although I will protect it if there is a fourth deletion. You are an inexperienced editor, so please read the guidance below carefully.

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• there shouldn't normally be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

Please make sure you fully understand the guidance, ask if you're unclear about anything, and take your time. Given the history of this page, if the article is deleted again, by me or another admin, I'll permanently create-protect it, so you need to get this right. I'd also suggest that you read Jeff Bezos as an example of a business biography Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidemsup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, It's quite unfortunate to find out that my account has been blocked. I do not have multiple accounts on Wikipedia and request you to unblock my account. This is my only Wikipedia account. I had created one account to understand Wikipedia some 7 or 8 years ago. I do not remember the details of this old account as it was created using some old e-mail id of mine. Other than that, I created this new account using my current e-mail address to try to learn to work with Wikipedia articles again. I have hardly attempted creating any pages. I started creating a page on a food item which got rejected. I tried creating a page about an experimental animation film maker for which I'm still trying to get better links. Then, I picked a random person from a Facebook campaign and turns out his page was deleted earlier. I just tried creating Chintan Bhagat's again with information that's available online. The editor who rejected the page gave me the reference of Jeff Bezos to rework on the page and had said that if it sounds promotional he will block it. It sounded challenging but I tried my best to work on the page with whatever was available from the earlier rejected page and whatever good links I could find online. I do not intend to promote the person but present an unbiased view of the person's profile. Since I have already researched and created the person's page, I wanted to put it up for review. If you want me to discontinue working on the page because someone attempted it earlier then let me know. I was aiming to write not just about people but about films, places, institutions, inventions, animals, etc. I would like to write or edit more articles across categories and am not interested in creating more accounts. There is no point in creating multiple accounts. If you have any questions for me, kindly ask me. It would be great if you can unblock my account so that I can move on with other general interest articles. Aidemsup (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:42, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidemsup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I request one of the Wikipedia administrators to review my unblock request. I do not intend to cause any trouble or waste your time. Also, allow me to work on my pages and review it. If you feel the pages don't have any potential, you can reject the page or block me. Also, if the page content does not make sense, you can tell me to leave the page or reject it when I submit it for review. The only thing I did was ask for opinion about a page I was working on from a Wikipedia editor in the live chat area. If there was a problem with my page or account, we could have sorted it through a conversation on the live chat or through my talk page. Kindly do not punish me for someone else's mistakes. Unblock me to give me the opportunity to publish good pages on Wikipedia. Thank you.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidemsup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, Kindly unblock my account. I understand the reason for my account being blocked. You feel that I am a sock puppet because I starting working on someone's page. I do not know the person who created the rejected pages and assure you that I am not a sock puppet. I used the information about the page that's already existing on Wikipedia to recreate the page with proper links. I won't work on that page again and will make other useful contributions instead. I won't work on people's page at all if that's a problem. Maybe I'll work on some other category of pages likes movies, fictional characters, animals, etc. instead of writing about people. Please unblock me so that I can at least explore writing about other topics. Please give me one opportunity. Thank you. Aidemsup (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidemsup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Kindly unblock my account. I assure you that I am not a sock puppet of Anuj Parikh and I don't know who the person is. I do not intend to create any unwanted pages instead will try to bring in some value with good edits. If I wanted to abuse multiple accounts, I would have given up and created another account. I am not interested in creating multiple accounts. I am hopeful that you will unblock me and give me an opportunity. After you unblock me, if I accidentally or intentionally end up creating a page or edit that's not useful, even if you block me, I won't appeal for it. It's a humble request to please unblock my account. Aidemsup (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aidemsup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock my account. I am not a sock puppet and don't want to be one. If I create another account to edit Wikipedia then I would become a sock puppet which isn't needed if you unblock me. After you unblock me, if you feel I am violating any rules, please feel free to block me. I won't appeal again. I have raised several unblock requests and am positive that you will give me a chance. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Also, I'm a bit concerned about your promotional articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vince Collins has been accepted

Vince Collins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

buidhe 00:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Kunji Kalathappam concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kunji Kalathappam, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kunji Kalathappam

Hello, Aidemsup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kunji Kalathappam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2020 (UTC)