Your submission at AfC Silicon-tin was accepted edit

 
Silicon-tin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alanl (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

A cookie for you! edit

  Great article! Alanl (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Mohammed Burhanuddin is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBIPA edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

@EdJohnston: Thanks. I will be careful with my edits. Let me know if you are referring to a particular edit. Aftab104 (talk) 12:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Articles related to the Dawoodi Bohra have been the subject of dispute due to the succession controversy. Through the pattern of edits, we often get the impression that some users have a strong allegiance to one of the factions. This causes us to be concerned about neutrality of edits. The 53rd Syedna succession controversy (Dawoodi Bohra) was fully protected for a month starting 29 March due to a dispute. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
@EdJohnston: Thanks for the information. I am not going to say that I don't belong to one of the factions, because that will be untrue. However, as a PhD Candidate in nanotechnology, and having written many, many research papers, I know very well how to detach emotion from factual content. Rest assured that none of my edits will be without valid sources. :) Aftab104 (talk) 12:04, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Muhammad M. Hussain edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muhammad M. Hussain, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Non-Dropframe talk 23:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Aftab104, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Muhammad M. Hussain have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David R. Clarke has been accepted edit

 
David R. Clarke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 15:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plz help me sir edit

Sir, can u plz help me to publish this article of a construction company https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Recwiki/sandbox Recwiki (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Recwiki: The subject is non-notable. Aftab104 (talk) 08:30, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article of the company was a subject of public interest. The significance of the article is to help the reader identify the organization, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization.So sir plz help me to publish this.Recwiki (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar (July 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aftab104! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar edit

 

Hello, Aftab104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply