November 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you recently removed content from FC Unirea Constanța without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at FC Unirea Constanța, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ACS Sportul Chiscani edit

Please learn how to create a page. I doubt that Liga IV were notable. Xx236 (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

You can help me. AdrianCioran (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Liga IV? Try to write it in Romanian Wiki. Xx236 (talk) 13:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ACS Sportul Chiscani moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to ACS Sportul Chiscani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of ACS Sportul Chiscani edit

 

The article ACS Sportul Chiscani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, does not pass WP:GNG or any notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 16:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ACS Sportul Chiscani moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to ACS Sportul Chiscani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ... discospinster talk 17:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Actually i give up AdrianCioran (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ACS Sportul Chiscani (November 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AdrianCioran! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:59, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ACS Sportul Chiscani edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ACS Sportul Chiscani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to CS Progresul Șomcuta Mare. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS Auxerre Lugoj moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, CS Auxerre Lugoj, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --– DreamRimmer (talk) 03:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Salut edit

Nu mai crea pagini daca nu te pricepi, pentru că ți le vor șterge moderatorii.Florin (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Write something constructive in the summary (preferable option), or don't write anything at all, but [I'm bored] and variations of it is not really appropriate. Thank you. --BlameRuiner (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stadionul Soda moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Stadionul Soda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. NotAGenious (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

current season edit

Salut. Nu mai pune ”current season” pe paginile echipelor, pentru că nu are nimeni timp să facă update după fiecare sezon, este pierdere de timp. Florin (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, AdrianCioran. Thank you for your work on CS Ocna Mureș. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about CS Auxerre Lugoj edit

Hello AdrianCioran, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, CS Auxerre Lugoj, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CS Auxerre Lugoj.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:CSU Alba iulia football logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, AdrianCioran. Thank you for your work on CSU Alba Iulia (football). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Horia Iancu moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Horia Iancu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stadionul Soda moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Stadionul Soda. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stadionul Soda edit

 

The article Stadionul Soda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines. I could not find anything else online either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

User name space edit

Please stop moving Draft:Armătura Zalău‎ into the user name space. It doesn't belong there. If you want it to be in your own personal user space, you would rename it to User:AdrianCioran/Armătura Zalău‎. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've corrected your further incorrect attempt to move the page. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

FC Armătura Zalău moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to FC Armătura Zalău. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Horia Iancu moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Horia Iancu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Horia Iancu for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horia Iancu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horia Iancu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 10:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of FC Armătura Zalău for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FC Armătura Zalău is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Armătura Zalău until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

  Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. Geschichte (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 12:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AdrianCioran (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am sorry for editing disruptly, I will edit less after I get unblocked.

Decline reason:

I don't know why you think it's the frequency of your edits which is the problem. Yamla (talk) 14:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.