Disruption on Talk:Uebert Angel

edit

There doesn't seem to be much point in taking the time to answer your edit requests on Talk:Uebert Angel, when you simply re-post without apparently reading the answers. The next time you repeat an already answered semi-protected edit request on Talk:Uebert Angel, [1][2] you will be blocked for disruption and wasting the time of constructive editors. Also, why have you created this account, when you already had Adney123? One person is supposed to have one account, no more. Bishonen | talk 14:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC).Reply

P.S. I see now that you added "Prophet Uebert Angel's wealth exposed" in front of the link the second time, so I suppose you were trying to comply with my instructions; I'm sorry I didn't see that at first. But a sentence fragment isn't something that can be added to an encyclopedia article. You need to add explanatory, coherent text, not merely the header of the reference you propose. Please look at the article and try to see what kind of text is acceptable. It needs to be written by yourself — not copypasted from the source's header. Bishonen | talk 15:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC).Reply