Aditya958

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aditya958! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 12:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that in this edit to Ho people, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax 05:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Citation needed templates in the lead

Please see WP:LEADCITE. The lead of an article summarizes the material that appears in the body of the article. Information that is cited to a reliable source within the body of the article doesn't usually require a redundant citation in the lead. Please stop adding "citation needed" to the Ho people article. The citations are already given in the appropriate subsections of that article.--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 06:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 12:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your edits to Munda people

Please stop. Your edits are becoming disruptive and extremely frustrating. There seems to be two issues: you seem to not be fluent in writing English and you seem to not be aware of key Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You are also confusing several ethno-linguistic groups that have DIFFERENT designations in English. We have two articles: Munda people and Munda peoples (one has an "s" and one doesn't. All of the people groups that speak a Munda language are listed at the Munda peoples article. Furthermore, each of those people groups have separate articles: Ho people, Munda people, Santali people, etc. Yes, Ho people speak a Munda language and therefore are grouped together in the Munda peoples article, but they are distinct from the related ethnic Munda (i.e. the people who speak Mundari). Please stop confusing them.--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 07:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Reply to William Thweatt

I know wikipedia policies and guidelines very well  .You donot have knowledge of enthinic groups of india .You are also poor in US english as well as British english.You are aleady confused with ethinic groups of india. Try to read indian history,tribes and castes of india.Donot go by what you know by your own perceptions.You are distrupting and extremely disgusting. How, can you say they are distinct from Munda people. Read the book Genetics study of tribes.If, if you have doubts,discuss with my talkpage.You are warmly welcome to discuss.

Aditya958 ^TalkContribs 13:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

You apparently are still not understanding. In English there is a difference between "Munda people" and "Munda peoples". Do you see the difference? One has an "s", and one doesn't. Ho are Munda peoples, but they are not Munda people. We have two separate articles: 1) Munda people and 2) Munda peoples. You are confusing the two and making a mess of the individual articles.--William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 08:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Leads summarise the article

And thus of course repeat some of the information that is in the article. Doug Weller talk 16:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Aditya958 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Calling someone disgusting shows lack of good faith. If you knew our policies and guidelines you would follow WP:AGF. Doug Weller talk 16:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ho people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Munda people, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Munda people. - Arjayay (talk) 16:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Munda people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 17:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Arjayay Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Munda people, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Aditya958 (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Aditya958 (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Arjayay You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Munda people. - Aditya958 (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Munda people.
The above block was for your disruption at Munda people and you have continued exactly the same disruption, now the block has expired. Please stop, or your next block will be longer. - Arjayay (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Munda people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)