November 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm ~riley. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Notice period because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Adhigo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Notice period jobs edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Notice period jobs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Adhigo/sandbox edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Adhigo/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 10:08, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 10:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Adhigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Iam a first time contributor to wikipedia, yes I used to look for information in wiki, but never contributed to the pages. Basically want to contribute information related to employees looking for jobs and companies on hiring parameters, but not sure how wiki works. yes to me it looks bit ambiguity, need to gain more knowledge and may be contribute in bits and pieces. Hope you understand. Not everybody is expert in all fields, yes every body is expert in their respective fields . I respect wiki for it's sheer contribution of knowledge sharing to the global community. Thank you Adhigo (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This unblock request is almost incoherent. Regardless, it doesn't address your clear violation of WP:PROMO and your probable violation of WP:COI and WP:SPAM. Yamla (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Email edit

Nothing you said in your email to me was particularly confidential. I will not unblock you, as it seems like you believe your actions were appropriate (they weren't, they were a clear violation of WP:COI, WP:PROMO, and possibly WP:PAID). However, you are free to request another admin review your block. WP:GAB explains how. It would be best if you clearly specified your conflict of interest and told us what you'd edit instead, as you won't be unblocked to write about noticeperiod. --Yamla (talk) 13:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have revoked your email access. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply