Add925

Welcome!

Hello, Add925, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Gerry Ashton 16:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Reno Gang

Hello, Add925! I stumbled onto your above article and wanted to provide some feedback. First, it is a fairly good article; if you haven't already, you should read Wikipedia:Your first article. Other then some citation problems, it was a good read for me. You might want to check out WP:CITE to fix some referencing issues. I also wanted to let you know I removed the section from American Old West because the gang was 1) pre-"Wild West" era, and 2) too far east. I did leave it as a "See also" link. If you feel differently, I would invite you to initiate discussion on the talk page first. Otherwise, good article and happy editing! Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow, the article's looking pretty good. I would say that the refs still need proper formatting (I'm not that good at that...) and you should probably incorporate most of the external links into references, if possible (try to have no more than, say, four or so really pertinent external links listed separately in the "External links" section). Wikipedia:Footnotes gives a specific how-to, if you are interested. Also, when listing books use the method explained in Wikipedia:ISBN. You definitely should also add to the train robbery article, too. Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

welcome and Nicholson-Rand House

Hi Add925, I noticed your Nicholson-Rand House article. I am an active editor and have mostly worked on articles about NRHP-listed places. I like the pic and other aspects of what you did in that article about an NRHP already. Thanks! I wonder if you developed the nice NRHP infobox from scratch by yourself, or if you have already found your way to the convenient Elkman NRHP infobox generator tool. I commented, though, about sourcing questions at Talk:Nicholson-Rand House and wonder if you could reply there. In particular, do you have the NRHP nomination document for the house in electronic form that you could possibly share, either by a link or by emailing it? I would like to help improve the sourcing in that article. Welcome to wikipedia. Cheers, --doncram (talk) 15:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Legend of the Reno Brothers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Seymour and Scottsburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Jlrandhome2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Jlrandhome2.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:41, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lotrb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lotrb.jpg, which you've attributed to David Distler. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Go away wiki-narcs

Yes, that could be you. Your annoying accusations of copyright infringement are unfounded in my case. All it would take is a minimum effort to recognize I am the owner/creater of pics I post in Wikimedia.

Now go away

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SV Argo (1841), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Whitlock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SV Argo (1841), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sailing vessel and Port of New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SV Argo (1841), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samuel Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Add925. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Add925. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi, Add925! I had to delete the page Pizza by Donisi because it was a copyright violation of this blog. Valereee (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I cannot understand, what violated the copyright? Add925 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I am the owner of the blog. I am Dave distler and approve its use here Add925 (talk) 17:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

please restore my page Add925 (talk) 17:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

I cannot violate the copyright of my own blog. Please restore Pizza by Donisi Add925 (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

You can place a statement on the blog article releasing the contents to public domain with no rights limited. It won't help with showing notability, which is what it's being nominated for speedy deletion for now, though. All articles need to provide evidence of WP:NOTABILITY, which you can read about at that link. Valereee (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pizza by Donisi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pizza by Donisi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

delete this douchebag Add925 (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Delete this douchebag

yeah I said it Add925 (talk) 21:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ Tails Wx (he/him, aroace, 🐾) 21:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

delete this snowflake Add925 (talk) 21:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Yamla (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Statue of Hope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Legend of the Reno Brothers (box art).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Legend of the Reno Brothers (box art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)